I found much more interesting than the fare from your average "science writer". The self referential nature of cognition is something that is still not directly acknowledged by materialistic science but in the meantime we have the cognitive biases that behavioural economists speak to & this book about about expectation shapes our perception of reality. Worth a read
”Cutting people down” is what a samurai does apparently. That & a social code that is mired in social etiquette. I had hoped for some inspiration on living an honourable and disciplined life but there’s not much of that in here. Somewhat interesting as an account of the values of a particular people at a particular time.
I read this book because I wanted to understand more about the best ways of helping people to learn. Well, actually I am more interested in how to help them transform themselves in terms of their potential, but “learning” is a good place to start. And I think the author did a pretty good job. Just well executed. Engaging, entertaining and educational. Recommend.
I found much more interesting than the fare from your average “science writer”. The self referential nature of cognition is something that is still not directly acknowledged by materialistic science but in the meantime we have the cognitive biases that behavioural economists speak to & this book about about expectation shapes our perception of reality. Worth a read
A fluff piece; Its hard to imagine a less indepth exploration of ritual. He doesn't even bother to exert the mental effort to deconstruct what a ritual is, or to bring a useful categorisation to them. Or to share a formula for how to build one. And he's a Harvard professor! Feather light entertainment.
This could have been a much better book if the author had a different audience in mind when writing it instead of his frat-boy mates.
“An egosphere is a space, such as an apartment, that is associated to the discursive category of the individual (as a modern secular theological dogma).”
Just one example of way too many which is full of “insider” languaging. Seriously? Too much technical wank-speak & not at all necessary. I get it you're smart, but I think you let your ego get the better of you by not writing it in a more accessible way.
And in spite of this it is an important book, but not enough people will be able to grok that. (Also the behavioural psychology stuff on Skinner & Eyal was psych 101 level & would have been better left out).