Toxic Empathy
How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion
Ratings1
Average rating1
There Is A Case To Be Made For The Premise Of This Book. The Text Of This Book Does Not Make It.
And ultimately, that's the bottom line. Not because Stone Cold Said So, but because Stuckey was so utterly inept in trying to make her points that she didn't bother to do even cursory research into the issues - at least, at bare minimum, immigration and police abuse of citizens.
Her points about abortion seem reasonable, if almost verbatim from the pregnancy crisis centers anti-abortion advocates run. Be warned, through this section - the first chapter of the book - Stuckey dives deep on being as explicit as possible on what exactly happens during an abortion. Not for the squeamish, but it is also clear that she is going for shock value here. So take it as you will.
Similarly, in Chapter 2 when discussing transgenderism, she goes for the shock value quite often again, while also making some genuinely intriguing points - many of which have been pointed out by various others (sometimes on both conservative and "progressive" sides) over the years. Here, she cites some work that sounds promising - but which another 1* reviewer claims has been retracted due to failure to obtain institutional oversight review approval. Take that as you will.
In Chapter 3, discussing LGB issues more generally, Stuckey actually shows probably the most promise of the entire text of genuinely being more compassionate... except that even here, she often ignores Christ in favor of some US right wing 2000s era talking point or another.
And then, as mentioned earlier, the last couple of chapters are just such *utter* trash that to even begin to describe them... well, let's just say that it is *here*, in particular, that this book truly earns out my dreaded "gold mine" label. There is perhaps a modicum of genuinely good thought in these sections, but it is *so* buried under so much detritus that sifting through it may as well be moving mountains to find a fleck of gold dust. It is through this section in particular that I wish I had been able to see her bibliography, but this wasn't possible in the Audible form of the book I read.
And, lest the reader of my review think I wasn't going to point this out, there is indeed the constant and ever present proof texting - which is bad enough for a 1* deduction in and of itself.
Ultimately this is a right wing US political book calling itself a book about Christian thought... without ever actually (or, specifically, *accurately*) citing Christ's examples in literally anything at all she discusses.
I picked up this book because it was being so utterly destroyed in my circles on Twitter - and now I have to admit that those friends and other luminaries were far more correct than I'd have liked about this book. I wanted to be able to defend this text - as I said in the title, I firmly believe that a case for the general premise *can* be made and even *should* be made. I simply wish Stuckey had given even a wet Dollar General paper towel's worth of effort in crafting such an argument, rather than... whatever this is... that we ultimately got.
Not recommended for anyone but the truly masochistic.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
There Is A Case To Be Made For The Premise Of This Book. The Text Of This Book Does Not Make It.
And ultimately, that's the bottom line. Not because Stone Cold Said So, but because Stuckey was so utterly inept in trying to make her points that she didn't bother to do even cursory research into the issues - at least, at bare minimum, immigration and police abuse of citizens.
Her points about abortion seem reasonable, if almost verbatim from the pregnancy crisis centers anti-abortion advocates run. Be warned, through this section - the first chapter of the book - Stuckey dives deep on being as explicit as possible on what exactly happens during an abortion. Not for the squeamish, but it is also clear that she is going for shock value here. So take it as you will.
Similarly, in Chapter 2 when discussing transgenderism, she goes for the shock value quite often again, while also making some genuinely intriguing points - many of which have been pointed out by various others (sometimes on both conservative and "progressive" sides) over the years. Here, she cites some work that sounds promising - but which another 1* reviewer claims has been retracted due to failure to obtain institutional oversight review approval. Take that as you will.
In Chapter 3, discussing LGB issues more generally, Stuckey actually shows probably the most promise of the entire text of genuinely being more compassionate... except that even here, she often ignores Christ in favor of some US right wing 2000s era talking point or another.
And then, as mentioned earlier, the last couple of chapters are just such *utter* trash that to even begin to describe them... well, let's just say that it is *here*, in particular, that this book truly earns out my dreaded "gold mine" label. There is perhaps a modicum of genuinely good thought in these sections, but it is *so* buried under so much detritus that sifting through it may as well be moving mountains to find a fleck of gold dust. It is through this section in particular that I wish I had been able to see her bibliography, but this wasn't possible in the Audible form of the book I read.
And, lest the reader of my review think I wasn't going to point this out, there is indeed the constant and ever present proof texting - which is bad enough for a 1* deduction in and of itself.
Ultimately this is a right wing US political book calling itself a book about Christian thought... without ever actually (or, specifically, *accurately*) citing Christ's examples in literally anything at all she discusses.
I picked up this book because it was being so utterly destroyed in my circles on Twitter - and now I have to admit that those friends and other luminaries were far more correct than I'd have liked about this book. I wanted to be able to defend this text - as I said in the title, I firmly believe that a case for the general premise *can* be made and even *should* be made. I simply wish Stuckey had given even a wet Dollar General paper towel's worth of effort in crafting such an argument, rather than... whatever this is... that we ultimately got.
Not recommended for anyone but the truly masochistic.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
There Is A Case To Be Made For The Premise Of This Book. The Text Of This Book Does Not Make It.
And ultimately, that's the bottom line. Not because Stone Cold Said So, but because Stuckey was so utterly inept in trying to make her points that she didn't bother to do even cursory research into the issues - at least, at bare minimum, immigration and police abuse of citizens.
Her points about abortion seem reasonable, if almost verbatim from the pregnancy crisis centers anti-abortion advocates run. Be warned, through this section - the first chapter of the book - Stuckey dives deep on being as explicit as possible on what exactly happens during an abortion. Not for the squeamish, but it is also clear that she is going for shock value here. So take it as you will.
Similarly, in Chapter 2 when discussing transgenderism, she goes for the shock value quite often again, while also making some genuinely intriguing points - many of which have been pointed out by various others (sometimes on both conservative and "progressive" sides) over the years. Here, she cites some work that sounds promising - but which another 1* reviewer claims has been retracted due to failure to obtain institutional oversight review approval. Take that as you will.
In Chapter 3, discussing LGB issues more generally, Stuckey actually shows probably the most promise of the entire text of genuinely being more compassionate... except that even here, she often ignores Christ in favor of some US right wing 2000s era talking point or another.
And then, as mentioned earlier, the last couple of chapters are just such *utter* trash that to even begin to describe them... well, let's just say that it is *here*, in particular, that this book truly earns out my dreaded "gold mine" label. There is perhaps a modicum of genuinely good thought in these sections, but it is *so* buried under so much detritus that sifting through it may as well be moving mountains to find a fleck of gold dust. It is through this section in particular that I wish I had been able to see her bibliography, but this wasn't possible in the Audible form of the book I read.
And, lest the reader of my review think I wasn't going to point this out, there is indeed the constant and ever present proof texting - which is bad enough for a 1* deduction in and of itself.
Ultimately this is a right wing US political book calling itself a book about Christian thought... without ever actually (or, specifically, *accurately*) citing Christ's examples in literally anything at all she discusses.
I picked up this book because it was being so utterly destroyed in my circles on Twitter - and now I have to admit that those friends and other luminaries were far more correct than I'd have liked about this book. I wanted to be able to defend this text - as I said in the title, I firmly believe that a case for the general premise *can* be made and even *should* be made. I simply wish Stuckey had given even a wet Dollar General paper towel's worth of effort in crafting such an argument, rather than... whatever this is... that we ultimately got.
Not recommended for anyone but the truly masochistic.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
There Is A Case To Be Made For The Premise Of This Book. The Text Of This Book Does Not Make It.
And ultimately, that's the bottom line. Not because Stone Cold Said So, but because Stuckey was so utterly inept in trying to make her points that she didn't bother to do even cursory research into the issues - at least, at bare minimum, immigration and police abuse of citizens.
Her points about abortion seem reasonable, if almost verbatim from the pregnancy crisis centers anti-abortion advocates run. Be warned, through this section - the first chapter of the book - Stuckey dives deep on being as explicit as possible on what exactly happens during an abortion. Not for the squeamish, but it is also clear that she is going for shock value here. So take it as you will.
Similarly, in Chapter 2 when discussing transgenderism, she goes for the shock value quite often again, while also making some genuinely intriguing points - many of which have been pointed out by various others (sometimes on both conservative and "progressive" sides) over the years. Here, she cites some work that sounds promising - but which another 1* reviewer claims has been retracted due to failure to obtain institutional oversight review approval. Take that as you will.
In Chapter 3, discussing LGB issues more generally, Stuckey actually shows probably the most promise of the entire text of genuinely being more compassionate... except that even here, she often ignores Christ in favor of some US right wing 2000s era talking point or another.
And then, as mentioned earlier, the last couple of chapters are just such *utter* trash that to even begin to describe them... well, let's just say that it is *here*, in particular, that this book truly earns out my dreaded "gold mine" label. There is perhaps a modicum of genuinely good thought in these sections, but it is *so* buried under so much detritus that sifting through it may as well be moving mountains to find a fleck of gold dust. It is through this section in particular that I wish I had been able to see her bibliography, but this wasn't possible in the Audible form of the book I read.
And, lest the reader of my review think I wasn't going to point this out, there is indeed the constant and ever present proof texting - which is bad enough for a 1* deduction in and of itself.
Ultimately this is a right wing US political book calling itself a book about Christian thought... without ever actually (or, specifically, *accurately*) citing Christ's examples in literally anything at all she discusses.
I picked up this book because it was being so utterly destroyed in my circles on Twitter - and now I have to admit that those friends and other luminaries were far more correct than I'd have liked about this book. I wanted to be able to defend this text - as I said in the title, I firmly believe that a case for the general premise *can* be made and even *should* be made. I simply wish Stuckey had given even a wet Dollar General paper towel's worth of effort in crafting such an argument, rather than... whatever this is... that we ultimately got.
Not recommended for anyone but the truly masochistic.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Added to listOwnedwith 50 books.
