The Holdout

The book was good but the ending to both murders were absolute garbage truly.

4.5 Rounded to 5

I haven't read a legal thriller in a while. This was my BOTM pick in February of 2020 and because of a challenge on Instagram to read our BOTM backlist I finally picked this one up. I'm glad I did.

This is a fast-paced whodunit that I hard a hard time putting down. I even stayed up past my bedtime for this one and then preceded to finish it the next morning after. Yes, it had me that invested.

I have never read this author before and I love the writing style, format, story....just all of it. I definitely need to go find other books by this author and maybe not wait 2 years to read them.

Cookie cutter characters, unbelievably anticlimactic ending, plot was kind of a drag that relied heavily on a forked storyline ping-ponging the past and the present. Use of race for plot points was sloppy and undermined the argument trying to be made.

Audiobook notes: narrator was bland, brought neither life or excitement to any of these characters. Questionable accents attempted for some of the ethnic characters.

Tagline: “One Juror Changed the Verdict. What if She Was Wrong?”
... Yes, that's how the jury system works, that's fine with me.

The Holdout kept me entertained during a really stressful few days, but I think maybe I just don't like thrillers all that much. I mean, it was a fine way to pass the time, but I don't like having to suspend so much belief; I hate it when the protagonist finds herself in the midst of a crime scene and decides to Solve Everything Herself (even if, for once, as a defense attorney, she may be qualified to do some digging for herself, but NO because her lawyer/boss told her to not do anything stupid so of course she has to do fifteen stupid things immediately). There is no way any of this would have worked out as it did. The whole time I was reading, I kept thinking, “Your plot is full of holes!”

I'm also not sure how I feel about some of the Diversity Lessons that were thrown around. I can appreciate a white author trying to say stuff about not all POC being on the same side for the same reasons, and I can still feel weird about the fact that the only people who actually had to face any on-page consequences were Black or Latinx.

So. It was only okay. The longer I keep writing about it, the fewer stars I want to give it, so I'll stop here.

The was a great read! For all those who love a great courtroom and mystery novel. Highly recommend.

I am amazed at the quality of this book. Let me explain: it is not that i thought that this book was going to be bad, but rather the author's past works have been so varied in content and timelines, this was the first stab at a ‘who-done-it' for Moore (at least of this caliber). Calling all Christie fans this one's for you! (Although he does spoil the plots of a few of her works, just skip page 116 for less frustration and no impact on this plot). All characters were clearly laid out in the primary with minimal involvement from secondary characters. The trick that kept it captivating was this: there were a TON of primary characters. Thus, a TON of primary suspects. It was your job, as the reader, to keep the facts straight (but one of the main protaganists, Maya, had a fantastic organizational manner of thinking to help you out.) I'd say for someone who is ready to dabble in the thriller/suspense genre: this is a soft intro into a deep dark world. For those of us who are experienced: this was no ‘Sharp Objects' or ‘Behind Her Eyes', BUT it was enjoyable all the same to fly through an easily digestable story line in a legal setting through the eyes of the Juror's. This book begs the question: when it is your decision to decide the fate of another person without you physically being present at the time of the crime, how are you to factually know and confidently decide a verdict? What if that haunts you for the rest of your life? What would it look like and how would you deal? What does redemption look like to people of different backgrounds, races and social situations.

Additionally this book was organized with shorter chapters with multiple perspectives which made it even more of a highly addictive page-turner WOULD RECOMMEND

A really clever crime procedural, focusing more on the legal system and trial than on the usual police work. Graham Moore is a screenwriter, and that kind of comes across in the writing style. This novel has a kind of ‘made for a movie adaption' feel to it. This is not necessarily a bad thing. The characters are well developed and the twisty nature of the plot is a joy to follow.

This focus on the legal and judicial setting is clever as it moves the discussion onto some of the major flaws in the justice system. The fact that you can be encouraged to plead guilty to things you didn't do to make it easier to deny the bigger charges is definitely a weird one, but you increasingly here similar stories in real crime. It also takes a close look at the jury system and exposes some of the flaws there.

I picked this up as a break from my usual reading matter (I mostly read fantasy) and devoured the book in pretty much one sitting, finishing the whole thing in the space of a day. If that is not a solid recommendation, I don't know what is!

3.5 stars.
this felt like a modern take on the classic “whodunnit” Agatha Christie-type story - her stories are even brought up a few times. personally, I liked how tied to the justice system and juries this was but those who do not like courtroom dramas will probably not like that aspect. I liked the several discussions of racial issues within the criminal justice system, especially that Maya's white knight personality was called out (made me a little uncomfy that the author is white but I think it was still handled well). usually someone trying to investigate a crime they have no business investigating bothers me, but I think because Maya does have some sort of legal/criminal knowledge it didn't bug me as much. I also liked that I didn't really get much opportunity to guess who was actually responsible for both crimes.
I thought this was going to be more focused on the true crime documentary which I really would have liked but sadly it wasn't. the middle became a little tedious and boring. the ending felt a little rushed and almost unsatisfying, even though all questions are answered. overall, this was a pretty fun mystery but it didn't do anything new or crazy.

Solid mystery/thriller. Pretty much finished it in one sitting because I wanted to see where it would go next. 10/10 for strong female characters

I loved this book.

The story begins in the present day, ten years on from the original trial where 12 members of the public decided the fate of Bobby Nock and acquitted him for the murder of school girl Jessica Silver. This caused an uproar in the community and no juror's life was the same after the trial.

Ten years on, Rick , one of the jury, now believes he holds important information/evidence to prove that they gave the wrong verdict and they let a killer walk free. He calls all the jury back together to feature in a television documentary and to reveal his news. However, on the night they arrive at the hotel Rick is found murdered. Maya, believes she is being framed for his murder and desperately seeks to find out the truth of what new evidence Rick had, whether Bobby Nock was guilty of killing Jessica and who killed Rick.

Maya, the holdout in the trial, was a strong female lead character with so much guts and enthusiasm. You couldn't help but route for her in tracking down Bobby and clearing her own name from Rick's murder. I actually thought that all the female characters in this novel were strong, fiery women which I adored. The male characters, on the other hand, were flawed and in my opinion, seemed to required sympathy from the reader rather than holding their own within the story.

There was a lot going on in this book with the different story lines, characters, crimes and lines of inquiry. However, it never felt disjointed; the story flowed brilliantly and was very well written. What I particularly loved was hearing the Bobby Nock trial unfold through the different viewpoints of each of the jury. The courtroom drama made this book stand out for me. The themes of race and prejudices within society are brought together through the complexities and injustices surrounding the legal system which was extremely thought-provoking.

I thought the ending was very fitting and cleverly thought out. This book did not disappoint. It was my most anticipated read of 2020 and I have to say it completely lived up to it. If you love crime and thriller novels you will love this legal thriller which has to be on your list this year. I read it in 3 days which is unheard of when juggling work and family life. I just had to pick it up at every opportunity, it is that addictive.