Ratings1
Average rating3
A bit frustrating, this one. The author fires out loads of ideas, some of which land and some of which don't, and also teases out lots of threads for discussion. The problem for me is that most of these threads just don't get tugged on enough. There are seeds of some really worthwhile discussion here, but it all gets passed over very quickly. It's partly a failing of the monograph format, I guess, but I would have preferred a book of this length to concentrate on fewer things and follow through on them a bit more. It doesn't help that the whole thing is written in an academic style, which a) brings back terrible memories of my own dissertation, and b) adds a layer of unnecessary verbiage to a book that's already chafing against size restrictions. It's interesting, but not what it could be.