Solar
Ratings36
Average rating3.1
I enjoyed the read until the ending, It resolved nothing and left many unanswered questions.
Perhaps it's schadenfreude, or simple voyeurism, but only Ian McEwan and Margaret Atwood can make unlikeable characters so engaging. McEwan is also a master at believable immersion in the technical aspects of the characters' world, in a way that myself, a former scientist, is totally engrossed. McEwan nails how scientists think, interact, and the hypocrisies and benefits, habits and mannerisms, as well as the unique demands on the mind and “real lives” of scientists. Reading this book was like being back as a professional scientists. The conversations were realistic, the thoughts and judgments of the characters were completely like the people I've worked with.Back to McEwan's unique skills as a writer: Solar features an overweight Nobel Prize winner who spends his time labeled as a scientist, lending the weight of his laureate-hood to “important” projects, the most keen being climate change. Told in three phases, the story revolves around the dissolution of Michael Beard's fifth and final marriage, then around his attempts to build on the tragedy that ended it, and finally how he comes very close to realizing the dreams laid out in the first section. Beard is not a good person. He has apparently won a prize not just for physics, but for denial, all the way to the end of the book. It snuck up on me as a reader, but whereas in the beginning Beard seems like kind of an endearing but hypocritical character, by the end his denial is so clear I expected him to react the way he did. And all of it is told in a perfectly sarcastic, almost slapstick voice. This isn't [b:Atonement 6867 Atonement Ian McEwan https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1320449708s/6867.jpg 2307233] at all, and the voice fits the story. This book is a good rebuttal to anyone who thinks that characters have to be likeable. They don't, and plenty of authors prove otherwise.Note to [a:Douglas Adams 4 Douglas Adams https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1189120061p2/4.jpg] fans: there is a scene in this book that looks entirely like a rip-off of [b:So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish 6091075 So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish (Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, #4) Douglas Adams https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1327873354s/6091075.jpg 3078120], and I kinda freaked out when I read it. I was about ready to lose faith in McEwan, and strike him from my list of favorite authors, but keep reading! It plays into the story well, and even changed my opinion of Adams himself.
Un ottimo libro, scritto come sempre stupendamente da McEwan. Rispetto ad altri suoi libri questo l'ho trovato più intenso,la storia mi ha appassionato, così come ho trovato interessante il tema scientifico che caratterizza il racconto (le energie rinnovabili e il cambiamento climatico). Nel complesso un libro molto ben riuscito, senza sbavature e privo di momenti noiosi, da leggere d'un fiato.
This gave me everything I could have asked for from a new Ian McEwan, a topical subject,[ global-warming:] and a totally human, messy character making a mess of his life as we make a mess of the planet.
My criticisms, if any, are very small ones.
If one thinks of a random number to put in a story the usual choice will be 23, and this happens several times.