Geoengineering and the Audacious Quest to Fix Earth's Climate
“Thoughtful, informative, and darkly entertaining. It’s the best treatment of this important (and scary) topic you can find.” —Elizabeth Kolbert Right now, a group of scientists is working on ways to minimize the catastrophic impact of global warming. But they’re not designing hybrids or fuel cells or wind turbines. They’re trying to lower the temperature of the entire planet. And they’re doing it with huge contraptions that suck CO2 from the air, machines that brighten clouds and deflect sunlight away from the earth, even artificial volcanoes that spray heat-reflecting particles into the atmosphere. This is the radical and controversial world of geoengineering, which only five years ago was considered to be “fringe.” But as Jeff Goodell points out, the economic crisis, combined with global political realities, is making these ideas look sane, even inspired. Goodell himself started out as a skeptic, concerned about tinkering with the planet’s thermostat. We can’t even predict next week’s weather, so how are we going to change the temperature of whole regions? What if a wealthy entrepreneur shoots particles into the stratosphere on his own? Who gets blamed if something goes terribly wrong? And perhaps most disturbing, what about wars waged with climate control as the primary weapon? There are certainly risks, but Goodell believes the alternatives could be worse. In the end, he persuades us that geoengineering may just be our last best hope—a Plan B for the environment. His compelling tale of scientific hubris and technical daring is sure to jump-start the next big debate about the future of life on earth. “Goodell explores with infectious curiosity and thoughtful narration this strange, promising, and untested suite of climate fixes.” —BusinessWeek “A quick, enjoyable read through a complex, timely topic. And after you read it, you’ll never look at the sky or the ocean—or Earth, really—in quite the same way again.” —The Christian Science Monitor
Reviews with the most likes.
DNF @ 27%.
Not gonna bother rating it, but I DNFed it very intentionally and with great gusto - I BANISHED it. Here's why:
- This was published in 2010. Fourteen years later, it felt VERY dated.
- The science felt dated. For example, the author talks about how completely implausible it is that we'll EVER get off coal and this 2022 video by Kurzgesagt discusses just that.
- The examples of EVERYTHING felt cherry-picked. The scientists he spoke with, the historical figures he chose to centralize (rainmakers and Edward Teller).
- The anti-geoengineering arguments felt overstated and strawmanly. Like, I AM very curious about the political economy of geoengineering. But it was hard to wade through all the broey journalist “aaaaaah” noise to find the kernels of ACTUAL argument.
- DID I MENTION HOW BROEY THIS WAS? The straw(s) that broke the proverbial feminist camel's back were a few: (1) first, who he chose to emphasize and centralize the voices of - it just felt so incredibly limited and boring. Like, I just learned that the inventor of the solar desalination still was Maria Telkes - DOUBLE X CHROMOSOME COMIN AT YA. But, here, no. It's just a history of great men. (2) Next, he makes several off-hand broey jokes like, “Mother Nature was showing some serious leg” (to signify that it was a beautiful day) and how Great Man Scientist X spent his youth “shagging nurses” and was “refreshingly candid about sex” and I was just like, ya know... this is obnoxious. And finally, (3) I kinda already stated this, but I feel like this interaction between presenting geoengineering as another example of Great Men of History guiding history was just so boring and reductive and not actually informative.
Soooo. Yeah. If anyone knows any more recent books, with updated climate science and with a less simplified and more political economy-minded portrayal of the pros and cons, HIT ME UP.