Crossings

I took a long time to finish this book. It was not because I was not enjoying it, but because I read it twice. There are two ways to read the book a)the normal way from front to back and b) the Baroness sequence - a sequence that changes the narrative.

I enjoyed the book anyway I read it. There is mystery, there is a romance and there is the unexplained . The story spans 150 years and seven generations.it is about a manuscript written by Charles Baudelaire and the journey to find it. I love books about books specially when they are at the heart of the matter.

Highly recommended. My thanks to Netgalley that gave me this book to read and review.

Interessante romanzo fantasy sulla reincarnazione dell'anima. Ritmo non sempre serrato e ogni tanto un poco frammentato. 7

I don't know what category to put this in. I read the “Baroness” sequence and enjoyed it immensely.I might go back and just read it like a normal book from cover to cover. This is the story of a lifetime. Actually I should say lifetimes.

Crossings was a curious yet slightly disappointing read. I was intrigued by the structure of the book and the concept of multiple lifetimes. I was let down by characters I did not emphasize with, at all, and overly flourished language that grew tiresome throughout the book.

The first story, ‘The Education of a Monster,' sets the stage for the rest of the book and introduces the reader to the concept of crossing. Baudelaire, the narrator of this story, was the least likable narrator of the whole novel for me. He's a central figure of the book, however, and ties the characters and stories together.

The second story, ‘City of Ghosts,' was a bit tedious through its first half – the language felt pretentious. I enjoyed the last two sections of the story, as there was more action and less time in the narrator's head.

The third story was my favorite by far and the most interesting of the three. You get the final pieces of the puzzle and find out what's been going on throughout many lifetimes. Plus, I liked Alula's viewpoint much more.

I think the thought will haunt me that I should have read it the other way first. Seriously, please don't give me so much power before I even know what the book is about. In terms of understanding what's happening, I think reading it the conventional way (front to back) works best. For a more exciting and engaging story, I think the Baroness sequence is the way to go. You'll be confused for a bit, but I think that mystery would make it more interesting.

Ultimately, I can't decide how I feel about Crossings. It was an intriguing premise that got bogged down by name dropping, excessive speeches masquerading as dialogue, and very few likable characters. But I enjoyed the story and mystery enough to keep reading. I don't know if the unique structure of the book and the concept of ‘crossing' can make up for not caring what happened in the story.

Thank you to Netgalley and the publisher for providing this ARC in exchange for an honest review.