Albanian: Maqasid Al-Shariah: A Beginner’s Guide

Current applications (or rather, misapplications) of Islamic law are reductionist rather than holistic, ‎literal rather than moral, one-dimensional rather than multidimensional, binary rather than multi-‎valued, deconstructionist rather than reconstructionist, and causal rather than teleological. There is lack ‎of consideration and functionality of the overall purposes and underlying principles of the Islamic law ‎as a whole. Further, exaggerated claims of ‘rational certainty’ (or else, ‘irrationality’) and ‘consensus of ‎the infallible’ (or else, ‘historicity of the scripts’) add to lack of spirituality, intolerance, violent ‎ideologies, suppressed freedoms, and authoritarianism. ‎ Thus, a maqasidi approach takes juridical issues to a higher philosophical ground, and hence, overcomes ‎‎(historical) differences over politics between Islamic schools of law, and encourages a much-needed ‎culture of conciliation and peaceful coexistence. Moreover, the realization of purposes should be the ‎core objective of all fundamental linguistic and rational methodologies of ijtihad, regardless of their ‎various names and approaches. Thus, the validity of any ijtihad should be determined based on its level ‎of achieving ‘purposefulness,’ or realizing maqasid al-shari’ah.‎