Rafael
I started reading this book after someone recommended it to me. It is a strange one. Written like a diary with office emails, doodles and photos in between to create a believable world where Janet doesn't like her photo. It just didn't pull me in. At least not the first time, I stopped after two or three chapters. A while later I looked at what ebooks I had with me and decided to give this one another chance.
I'm glad I did, "Deadlines don't care if Janet doesn't like her photo" feels like watching "The Office", except instead of selling paper, they're a design agency. Thorne's portrayal of agency work is mostly spot on, at least from my experience. Some chapters are hilarious, other jokes just didn't work for me. I think comedy is hard to do in a book, David Thorne has managed to write one that I'd recommend. Maybe I was just in a silly enough mood when I read it the second time.
I started reading this book after someone recommended it to me. It is a strange one. Written like a diary with office emails, doodles and photos in between to create a believable world where Janet doesn't like her photo. It just didn't pull me in. At least not the first time, I stopped after two or three chapters. A while later I looked at what ebooks I had with me and decided to give this one another chance.
I'm glad I did, "Deadlines don't care if Janet doesn't like her photo" feels like watching "The Office", except instead of selling paper, they're a design agency. Thorne's portrayal of agency work is mostly spot on, at least from my experience. Some chapters are hilarious, other jokes just didn't work for me. I think comedy is hard to do in a book, David Thorne has managed to write one that I'd recommend. Maybe I was just in a silly enough mood when I read it the second time.
Geometry for Ocelots
First of all I want to say that I will not support Exurb1a in the future. I recommend that you search for "Pieke Roelofs" online for the reasons behind this. In short, after some research on the subject, I am personally convinced that her story is real. And what a horrible story it is.
I'll now do my best to review the book on its own merits. The star rating is my opinion of the book. It has interesting concepts. What originally caught my attention was seeing Buddhist principles in a sci-fi setting. Theories of resource scarcity and this book's take on a society that consumes itself to death are good at points.
Given the subject matter, I wanted to like the book. Space Buddism was enough of a hook for me to finish the book, just to find out where "Geometry for Ocelots" was going with it. In the end, unfortunately, I just didn't like the book that much. The story and its characters are dragged through the plot without having time to breathe. The characters, instead of being believable or, in my opinion, relatable, are mostly used to move things along. Issues such as alcoholism and suicide are not handled well and are normalized or even glorified throughout most of the book.
For a book that deals with complicated issues, it lacks nuance at every turn. The main characters are all some extreme on a spectrum. Evil, good, drunk, or lacking any agency. After the first few chapters there is also very little world building.
The first few chapters were promising, I liked how the characters were introduced and the core ideas this book was trying to tackle. "Geometry for Ocelots" just had no idea where to go with it. So it ended up going nowhere interesting.
First of all I want to say that I will not support Exurb1a in the future. I recommend that you search for "Pieke Roelofs" online for the reasons behind this. In short, after some research on the subject, I am personally convinced that her story is real. And what a horrible story it is.
I'll now do my best to review the book on its own merits. The star rating is my opinion of the book. It has interesting concepts. What originally caught my attention was seeing Buddhist principles in a sci-fi setting. Theories of resource scarcity and this book's take on a society that consumes itself to death are good at points.
Given the subject matter, I wanted to like the book. Space Buddism was enough of a hook for me to finish the book, just to find out where "Geometry for Ocelots" was going with it. In the end, unfortunately, I just didn't like the book that much. The story and its characters are dragged through the plot without having time to breathe. The characters, instead of being believable or, in my opinion, relatable, are mostly used to move things along. Issues such as alcoholism and suicide are not handled well and are normalized or even glorified throughout most of the book.
For a book that deals with complicated issues, it lacks nuance at every turn. The main characters are all some extreme on a spectrum. Evil, good, drunk, or lacking any agency. After the first few chapters there is also very little world building.
The first few chapters were promising, I liked how the characters were introduced and the core ideas this book was trying to tackle. "Geometry for Ocelots" just had no idea where to go with it. So it ended up going nowhere interesting.
This is a children's book, but a wonderful one. I didn't expect to like this book or find its language accessible, considering it was written over 150 years ago. But I was wrong, it's easy to see how this book has held its place as a classic for so many years.
It's made to be read to children, it has a story that will have most kids asking for "just one more page" instead of falling asleep.
This is a children's book, but a wonderful one. I didn't expect to like this book or find its language accessible, considering it was written over 150 years ago. But I was wrong, it's easy to see how this book has held its place as a classic for so many years.
It's made to be read to children, it has a story that will have most kids asking for "just one more page" instead of falling asleep.
