The is the second time I have read this book but I only got half way through this time. I found it just a bit slow & not engaging enough.

I don't get it. No idea why anyone thought this book made any sense or was any good.

Too hard going. If there is a more obtuse way of saying something then the author has sought it out.

My bad for expecting more from a physicist. The limits of science as only measuring the portion of reality that can be measured is a massive constraint and no more so than for physicists. Expecting a revolutionary insight on time from one is hopeful but dumb.

Best thing about the book is that it is short. Nothing profound. Nothing original. Possibly a good Dummy's Guide for someone new to personal development.

One of the best books I have ever read on marketing. An easy to follow but powerful formula for building a brand story and executing on it

Really disappointing. I was looking forward to some robust complexity science but ended up with a guy that quotes Deepak Chopra. Surely the quintessential sign that this is poetry dressed up as science. He has written much better pieces elsewhere.

A radical and compelling epistemological and ontological theory. Could have probably got across the guts of it in a third of the space. I look forward to other people building on his work.

I know it said it was a primer but expected it to go into a little more detail than basic system dynamics. Disappointing

I love the breadth of Asher's imagination; so big. But the trouble for me with this book was that there's not enough humanity to root for. I will look for another Neal Asher book though cos he is a great author.

A bit of a yawn. Could have be written in 10% of the space.

If you want to change your habits then don't bother asking a scientist. Much better to read the book of a practitioner like James Clear.

All of these habit change gurus are following in the footsteps of BF Skinner who knew lots about training pigeons but fucking nothing about human beings.

Possibly the best philosophical book I have ever read. I think more Kindle highlights of passages in this book then any other I have read. I understand this book is from early in Bennett's career and some of his ideas expanded in later books but this book still stands alone.

My second read of this book and probably my favourite autobiography. My favourite of Gurdjieff's students and father of Systematics which in time I am sure will become to be recognised for the hugely significant contribution it is to the underlying architecture of the universe.

I read and appreciated this book 20 or 30 years ago and when I saw the cover looked forward to reading it again. I don't think it has aged well. It feels like it becomes to a bygone age of slightly preachy people who know more answers than questions. Best part is section on discipline.

Disappointing. Repetitive. Boring. Trying to make up a story about strangers where none exists; at least not with the threads he pulled on. This is just a story about the architecture and vagaries of perception. It would have been a better book if he chose that as a theme