João Vitor Silveira Ribeiro

If you're searching for a work that embodies the "Kafkaesque" mood, this is one of Kafka's works that best captures it. In my opinion, this mood is even more pronounced in this book than in the popular short story "Metamorphosis." However, if you're not interested in exploring this mood, you might find the book less appealing. It can be confusing and repetitive, often leaving you with the feeling that you don't know what's happening.

One aspect that could be improved is the fact that the book was not finished. While this isn't a major issue, it did stand out to me more here than in some of Kafka's other works. I was left wanting more, which can be both a positive and a negative. It's something to keep in mind.

Overall, it's brilliant. I'm glad I read it, and I'm glad I'm done with it.

It's a good book that I recommend everyone read. While it's not a great work and I feel the author could have delivered more, especially on certain topics covered in the story, it's still a worthwhile read. My expectations were higher, but it remains a commendable effort.

Despite these reservations, I firmly recommend it to all. The book is an excellent example of science fiction, exploring various philosophical topics, though it does not delve deeply into them. It addresses the fallacies of both capitalism and socialism, illustrating how human nature—characterized by bureaucracy, power consolidation, judgment, and inequality—inevitably undermines any system, regardless of societal intentions.

You'll find yourself contemplating ideas you may not have considered before.

The book is intended to be a satire, but I personally didn't perceive that while reading, making it somewhat challenging to grasp.

The book lacks a coherent plot, and the characters are not deeply developed, giving the impression that it is about nothing. Although some chapters are interesting, they do not make up for the overall tediousness of the book, despite it being well-written.

If you want to read Aldous Huxley, I recommend starting with his more famous works, such as "Brave New World."

The book is a good introduction to mathematics for beginners, but it is somewhat repetitive. Experienced mathematicians who already understand the subject may not gain much from reading it. The arguments presented are not very original and tend to be repetitive. The core idea, which focuses on the role of ambiguity, paradoxes, and similar concepts in the development of mathematics, is reiterated throughout the 400 pages without delving deeply into the epistemological issues it raises.

At times, the arguments become generic and vague. Phrases like "subjective objectivity," "objective subjectivity," and "subjective subjectivity" reflect a questionable, self-styled zen approach that feels out of place.

A must-read for anyone who enjoys Russian literature.