December 22, 2022

Preachy in both senses: moralistic and lacking sound arguments.

January 24, 2016

Makes me want to be a better person.

June 19, 2018

Surprisingly faithful re-telling of the myths. Not worth your time if you know them from before (but outside of Scandinavia that may not be a problem).

March 7, 2017
November 20, 2014

Boring, shallow and repetitive. Spends too much time using DFW as a sort of straw-man cod-philosopher, and returns to the same examples over, and over again.

View

Hagiography of limited value and scope. The author writes a lot about feelings, insight and profound experiences, but only rarely manages to actually convey a sliver of why/how those come to be (which is actually a point made throughout the book). Missed opportunity.

January 1, 2017

Just not interesting enough. Who cares what fiction writers thought about a hypothetical concept hundred years ago? Only worthwhile idea: the concept of time travel is a modern invention.

August 5, 2023

Extremely verbose, long winded story about cleverest/smuggest man alive(who is also blind! Amazing!) who solves crimes (while blind! Amazing!) in the exciting world of coin fetishists etc, featuring ridiculous stereotypes. Only recommended if you are excited by numismatics.

December 27, 2020
July 7, 2017
January 11, 2020

Interesting but only intermittently useful. Most of the scenarios they set up are not truly real life solutions (or indeed problems).

December 6, 2016
May 18, 2018
February 3, 2018

Not my cup of cunt.

May 19, 2018
July 18, 2015

Entertaining but the research is far too anecdotal and mixed to be taken seriously. The author frequently confuses the specific with the universal. Sometimes funny, but sometimes unintentionally so: the author spends time dismissing Karate Kid as unrealistic.

October 24, 2015

There is nothing there: a collection of sort of clever, sort of obvious metaphors, presented in a sort of serious manner. No ideas to latch onto. Post-whatever in the worst kind of way.

October 12, 2015

Surprisingly compelling and deep book. Thorough, if somewhat uncritical, summary of a wide range of ideas. Low point: Chapter on relationships bordering on self parody. Other than that, loads of stuff to work on/with.

July 5, 2015

Page upon page of vainglorious whining. Wasn't aware that the author was so young when she wrote it, but it makes the melodrama more understandable. Utter crud.

October 18, 2013

More of a recap of the most important plot-lines, adding some useful historical references.

April 6, 2014

Strong finish redeems it to a point, but far too long.

August 4, 2014

Both inspiring and haunting.

September 23, 2014

Narcissistic, solipsistic, self-serving, superficial, glib and tone deaf.

May 30, 2020