Pål Hernes Fiva

Interesting but only intermittently useful. Most of the scenarios they set up are not truly real life solutions (or indeed problems).

Page upon page of vainglorious whining. Wasn't aware that the author was so young when she wrote it, but it makes the melodrama more understandable. Utter crud.

Makes me want to be a better person.

As a journalist's take on current event: compelling, informative and thought provoking. As philosophical/political treatise: simplistic and naïve, i.e. the almost randomly quoting figures from history (Napoleon etc) which simply beggars belief, and the comparisons between a court case and various battles through history seem pretentious in the extreme.

Preachy in both senses: moralistic and lacking sound arguments.