Brad

I found this horribly biased and hiding behind the guise of being unbiased. Chip begins topics by presenting a dichotomy of both sides, sometimes falsely, and explaining that both need to be more understanding of each other. He then presents (often emotionally charged) anecdotes that nudge the reader towards his personal opinion before presenting any biblical based evidence, which I often found unsubstantial. He selectively chooses what evidence get supported by sources (sometimes outdated) and which we have to take his word for. I found this to be incredibly judgmental in its language and full of correlation but not causation assumptions.

I can tell this just has to be electric live