Probably 3.5. The storyline became a little extreme, but I really liked the development of Gunther in this book. Also, the Chandleresque wisecracking was far more restrained.

December 31, 2019

Not quite a Wow, but I did really like this book.

It has been a long time since I read New York Trilogy and another Auster (I cannot remember which) and I have no idea why I then stopped reading his books.

There is a pace and flow to this book which I loved.

February 4, 2018

DNF. After 250+ pages decided 780 pages of sword battles was not for me.

July 20, 2015

A DNF for me. 300 pages in and I am so bored with this book. Please take me back to the antique shop, it is the only place I was happy!

April 20, 2017

Be aware, there is no real conclusion at the end of this book - it is merely set-up for the next in the series.

December 27, 2021

Rather different in format - a tale told simply by reference to records and documents. The concept was a little flawed, evidenced by the author's reliance upon some unbelievably detailed diary entries. I did enjoy the read.

October 26, 2017

I thoroughly enjoyed this book. A very good spy story set around the Cuban missile crisis.

November 24, 2016

Really a 2.5 for me.

I thought there were some interesting ideas (accepting that the book stays within Wells's incorrect ideas on the science of the solar system), but the tale is far too long in the telling.

An unnecessary sequel - as so many sequels are.

March 19, 2018

For me the tale seemed to drag somewhat after about 2/3 of the way through and I was looking forward to reaching the end even more than Mustafa was looking forward to getting home.

I found the book a little soulless.

What happened to inverted commas around speech?

May 19, 2016

It's not perfect. I find I cannot say “wow” and give it 5 stars. Yet, my tears flow and my heart aches.

August 7, 2019

For me, one of a few early post war sci-fi books that stands the test of time, not because of the science (there is no attempt to make the book scientifically accurate) but because of the ideas and the quality of the writing.

December 17, 2017

Not my favourite in the series. Rather too heavy on the polictical lecturing and too light on the police procedural story.

September 10, 2020

A potentially interesting premise turned in to an increasingly over-wrought and unbelievable tale.

February 26, 2016

A DNF for me.

I rather enjoyed the set-up in which the history of the “special” books is explained. However, it then becomes incredibly slow, turgid and battle-heavy. Any deep meaning to be drawn from it escaped me. It just read like a rather boring “war-games” story.

May 13, 2018
April 16, 2019

A very enjoyable read. A challenge to the very concept of the “cosy” crime story.

April 5, 2019

Not quite a 4 but I really do enjoy the Van Veeteren stories.

September 24, 2018

It is more than 20 years since I first read this book. I loved it then. Now, I cannot for the life of me fathom why I did.

Oh, so many pages! Perhaps, if all the words were rearranged a meaning would be found?

February 12, 2018

I know that I did not understand everything in this book and, probably, barely grasped some of the ideas it plays with but I loved it.

October 24, 2016
August 3, 2018

Apart from the unnecessary social commentary interventions by Wells, this was an enjoyable, lightly comic novel.

May 16, 2020

3.5 really.

Beautifully written. I just occasionally lost the flow a touch by the use of Bangladeshi terms which I did not understand - my fault really.

July 2, 2015

Perhaps some rave reviews had raised my expectations too much, but I felt slightly disappointed with this book.

Unusually for me, I think I would have liked the story to be a bit longer. The family changed so much once money entered its life, that I wanted a bit more than just the “then and now”.

August 16, 2020

This isn't quit a 5 star Wow but it is pretty close. I loved its humour and humanity.

January 12, 2020