W zasadzie to oceniłabym na 4½ ★ – więcej niż „really liked it” ale jednak nie „it was amazing” – powiedzmy „it was great”. Ale już dawno przyjęłam zasadę zaokrąglania do góry w takich przypadkach, więc do średniej policzy się 5.

Extra star for the bull, the dog and the goat. ;-)

Do understand me – I do not say it's not a good book. But the Goodreads rating system is based on liking, and while I agree this is a good book, it is one I really do not care about...

I liked the story, but have no idea why would anyone treat it as a sf-f...

Am I the only one who wanted to strangle Flavia's father? He loved Harriet so much that he would rather part with her house then with one very valuable book, because they have signed it together? Aaaargh.

An extra star for the excellent Saint Nick trap. Read and learn, Bob Howard! ;-)

Czyta się równie miło jak w dzieciństwie, choć może już nie z takimi wypiekami na twarzy ;-)

W zasadzie tylko za Dukaja się należy. Napisał IMO jedyne zmysłowe opowiadanie w antologii... Reszta jest albo o seksie albo o braku seksu (a czasem i o tym nie). Zmysłowości, a tym bardziej erotyki, nie widzę w nich żadnej.

This was a strange one. Somewhat like a Douglas Adams book, but a lot darker.
Think of the final parts of Fforde's Shades of Grey compared to his Thursday Next series.

Cztery gwiazdki za język, trzy za treść, dwie za turpizm...

Sadly, no unicorns. A FHK-style unicorn would probably earn an extra star ;-)

Waitaminute, this is what Brandon S. calls “standalone”? I think someone should dig out a dictionary...

The whole series is great, with the first book being my favorite. If I could give half-stars rating it would be 5 for the first volume, 4 for the second and 4.5 for the third one. But somehow rounding the 4.5 to 5 this time does not seem right, so 4 stars it is.

Yes, it was a reread. This time I have been skipping the military parts...

Ocena oczko niższa niż 1 tomu - głównie ze względu na straszliwie irytującą narratorkę. Ale nie porzucam Fandorina. :-)

Too American. To compare to TV: I prefer Hustle to Leverage. The key difference: the British crew does not need a “muscle man”. As for the book (more likely a short story or a novelette) – Leland Hale has no problem with killing someone which puts him few steps lower then Stainless Steel Rat...

Finally a Leland Hale story I liked. Of course, it's the last one :->.
The con if properly convoluted (which does not mean I wold not improve it a bit ;-)) and the victims are crooked themselves – as it should be in a proper con. :-)

A bit better then the first one, but the con a bit ubelievable. Yes, I know, it is a pulp sf story, so what do I expect? Well, if I can not have believability, I would settle for some fun. Unfortunately humor is missing, too. Or it is not my kind of humor.