Jeff Sexton
Strong "Finale". I use "finale" in quotes in the title of this review because it seems we are getting a Christmas "epilogue" for this series later this year, at least per book site listings as I write this review nearly a week before this book publishes.
This noted, the story here absolutely reads like a genuine and strong finale of a series that has put its main characters through quite a lot... and has still more for them to go through. The laughs... and dusty rooms... are both timed and executed well, even as many of them seemingly come out of the blue - particularly the dusty rooms. Yet every aspect here remains perfectly true to who each of the main characters are, even as the situations they find themselves in through the course of this series finale are very unexpected.
Even as someone who first came to this series at Book 4, and thus missed the developments of the first three books, this really was very well done - one of the better finale/ wrap-ups/ send-offs I've seen done in a series finale in any medium, and certainly *far* superior to the various infamous finales over the years. No one is waking up and claiming it was all a dream here, y'all. ;)
Read the rest of the series before reading this book. But then make sure you have some tissues ready, because when those dusty rooms hit in this book - and yes, I said "rooms", as in plural - they *really* hit, and you're going to need them.
Fortunately each book in the series (at least those I've read) is at or under 200 pages, which makes them all fairly quick reads, even for busy parents (or others busy with whatever life you may lead).
By the time you get to the end of this one, you'll be satisfied with where Gilbert leaves these characters... but you're also going to welcome that epilogue currently scheduled to release in late October 2025. ;)
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Strong "Finale". I use "finale" in quotes in the title of this review because it seems we are getting a Christmas "epilogue" for this series later this year, at least per book site listings as I write this review nearly a week before this book publishes.
This noted, the story here absolutely reads like a genuine and strong finale of a series that has put its main characters through quite a lot... and has still more for them to go through. The laughs... and dusty rooms... are both timed and executed well, even as many of them seemingly come out of the blue - particularly the dusty rooms. Yet every aspect here remains perfectly true to who each of the main characters are, even as the situations they find themselves in through the course of this series finale are very unexpected.
Even as someone who first came to this series at Book 4, and thus missed the developments of the first three books, this really was very well done - one of the better finale/ wrap-ups/ send-offs I've seen done in a series finale in any medium, and certainly *far* superior to the various infamous finales over the years. No one is waking up and claiming it was all a dream here, y'all. ;)
Read the rest of the series before reading this book. But then make sure you have some tissues ready, because when those dusty rooms hit in this book - and yes, I said "rooms", as in plural - they *really* hit, and you're going to need them.
Fortunately each book in the series (at least those I've read) is at or under 200 pages, which makes them all fairly quick reads, even for busy parents (or others busy with whatever life you may lead).
By the time you get to the end of this one, you'll be satisfied with where Gilbert leaves these characters... but you're also going to welcome that epilogue currently scheduled to release in late October 2025. ;)
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Added to listBookAnon.com Summer 2025 Reading Listwith 46 books.
Brennan Expands Her Storytelling In A New And Refreshing Direction. Long time fans of Brennan, and even those who have only started reading her this decade like me, know she is most well known for very *dark* murder tales and the teams investigating them.
This book is not that. At all. While it retains *some* elements of that - bodies are piling up rather rapidly at a small private island resort - this is much more a pure romantic suspense with strong island vibes. Thus, we get a lot more tropical/ island feel here than is typical of Brennan's writing to date... and that is an *amazing* thing to see, as she executes it so well. About the only thing Brennan could have done to be even more different than her usual style would be to go pure bubblegum pop romcom, and while this is nowhere near that... there are certainly both comedic and spicy moments, making the reader literally laugh out loud at times while offering perhaps around a jalapeno level spice - more than a warm glass of milk, but also far less than the ghost peppers of books I read earlier in the week before reading this book.
Truly well done, and a very welcome and refreshing departure from where Brennan has been these last several years at minimum, this reader at least is hoping both sides of her storytelling will continue.
Very much recommend.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Brennan Expands Her Storytelling In A New And Refreshing Direction. Long time fans of Brennan, and even those who have only started reading her this decade like me, know she is most well known for very *dark* murder tales and the teams investigating them.
This book is not that. At all. While it retains *some* elements of that - bodies are piling up rather rapidly at a small private island resort - this is much more a pure romantic suspense with strong island vibes. Thus, we get a lot more tropical/ island feel here than is typical of Brennan's writing to date... and that is an *amazing* thing to see, as she executes it so well. About the only thing Brennan could have done to be even more different than her usual style would be to go pure bubblegum pop romcom, and while this is nowhere near that... there are certainly both comedic and spicy moments, making the reader literally laugh out loud at times while offering perhaps around a jalapeno level spice - more than a warm glass of milk, but also far less than the ghost peppers of books I read earlier in the week before reading this book.
Truly well done, and a very welcome and refreshing departure from where Brennan has been these last several years at minimum, this reader at least is hoping both sides of her storytelling will continue.
Very much recommend.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Sexual Exploration Romcom. The title of this review says it all. This is *easily* one of the actually closest to erotica romcoms I've ever encountered, with pretty well the entire plot focused around sexual exploration and a somewhat thin, yet still fun and compelling, plot wrapped around that to tie the sex scenes together.
I would say the comedic elements here are fewer and further between than they were in Nine Month Contract, but they're still present - and the animals (primarily a cat in this tale, which first appeared in Nine Month Contract) don't quite steal the scenes as much in this tale, despite being nearly equally present.
Instead, this book revolves more around healing from past traumas of both halves of our main couple, including one particular event seven years ago that may not have gone down exactly as each understood it to have.
And yes, lots and lots of ghost pepper level "spice", though without some of the elements of Nine Month Contract that may have turned some off from that tale. And while this part of the tale may make some uncomfortable, it is actually handled quite well within the story being told.
Overall still a compelling romance with comedic moments, this one is likely less problematic for some than its predecessor, while still being nearly as problematic as its predecessor - or even more problematic - for others. Still, for what it actually is, it really is quite good and any issues are with the reader, not with Daws' storytelling here.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Sexual Exploration Romcom. The title of this review says it all. This is *easily* one of the actually closest to erotica romcoms I've ever encountered, with pretty well the entire plot focused around sexual exploration and a somewhat thin, yet still fun and compelling, plot wrapped around that to tie the sex scenes together.
I would say the comedic elements here are fewer and further between than they were in Nine Month Contract, but they're still present - and the animals (primarily a cat in this tale, which first appeared in Nine Month Contract) don't quite steal the scenes as much in this tale, despite being nearly equally present.
Instead, this book revolves more around healing from past traumas of both halves of our main couple, including one particular event seven years ago that may not have gone down exactly as each understood it to have.
And yes, lots and lots of ghost pepper level "spice", though without some of the elements of Nine Month Contract that may have turned some off from that tale. And while this part of the tale may make some uncomfortable, it is actually handled quite well within the story being told.
Overall still a compelling romance with comedic moments, this one is likely less problematic for some than its predecessor, while still being nearly as problematic as its predecessor - or even more problematic - for others. Still, for what it actually is, it really is quite good and any issues are with the reader, not with Daws' storytelling here.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Apparently Controversial. Fucking Hilarious. Near-Perfect (If Unusual) Romcom. I picked up this book specifically because I agreed to work its sequel (Seven Year Itch) as a blog tour... before realizing that book was a sequel. When I found out, I knew I needed to read this book first.
Now, upfront, I've read a LOT of books over the years that some will find disgusting or *well* against their moral philosophies for various reasons and rated most all of them fairly highly - 4 or 5 stars in every case I'm thinking of at the moment. Those have ranged from a look at sexual ethics through the eyes of a hyper conservative American Evangelical Christian lens all the way to a MM romance series that openly involved (adult) baby/ diaper kink. I'm *also* a guy who was introduced to porn because his Pastor, who would later become a President of the Georgia Baptist Convention, once spoke against videoing not only a baby's birth, "but also its conception". As a young and sheltered teenage boy who was very scientifically curious... I had to find those videos. (Here's a tip, Pastors: *Never do this in a mixed congregation.*)
Thus, coming into a book involving a degree of breeding kink was nothing particularly shocking for me. (If it is for you, you *really* don't want to go into some of the Omegaverse type stuff. Seriously, just forget you ever even heard that word.) Yes, the entire setup is rather unusual - the book goes through great pains to explore that exact facet of the relationship, and indeed much of the drama in this romcom is specifically due to the unusual nature of how our male and female leads meet and begin to interact.
Instead, most everything I've seen anyone complaining about in previous reviews of this book are largely played either for comedy or for enhancing the tension and drama, and both sides of this romantic comedy work quite well in their separate lanes, and indeed come together to make one of the more stand-out and interesting romcoms I've read in quite some time. Again, it won't be for everyone, for varying reasons. But for those that can allow your brains to accept this tale for just a few hours, you're going to come away with one of the more memorable romance tales I've read in literally years. Here, I speak as a man who reads on average 200 books per year across nearly all (non swords and sorcery fantasy) genres.
Even the standard inclusion of who the next couple in the series will be is done well by including them when it makes sense in *this* story, but not having them dominate the screen in their scenes the way I've seen others do over the years.
Spice level wise... y'all, breeding kink is a major thing here. Thus, the spice level is pretty well ghost pepper/ damn near erotica level at times, but with the main focus of the book being on the actual story. But when it goes to sex scenes... not only does it not fade to black, it gets into a lot of stuff that will make a lot of people fairly squeamish, and not always in good ways. So yet again, be prepared for this, and if this isn't really your thing... this book likely won't be for you, and that is perfectly ok.
Truly an unconventional and thus memorable romcom, but again, it won't be for everyone. *And that is perfectly ok.*
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Apparently Controversial. Fucking Hilarious. Near-Perfect (If Unusual) Romcom. I picked up this book specifically because I agreed to work its sequel (Seven Year Itch) as a blog tour... before realizing that book was a sequel. When I found out, I knew I needed to read this book first.
Now, upfront, I've read a LOT of books over the years that some will find disgusting or *well* against their moral philosophies for various reasons and rated most all of them fairly highly - 4 or 5 stars in every case I'm thinking of at the moment. Those have ranged from a look at sexual ethics through the eyes of a hyper conservative American Evangelical Christian lens all the way to a MM romance series that openly involved (adult) baby/ diaper kink. I'm *also* a guy who was introduced to porn because his Pastor, who would later become a President of the Georgia Baptist Convention, once spoke against videoing not only a baby's birth, "but also its conception". As a young and sheltered teenage boy who was very scientifically curious... I had to find those videos. (Here's a tip, Pastors: *Never do this in a mixed congregation.*)
Thus, coming into a book involving a degree of breeding kink was nothing particularly shocking for me. (If it is for you, you *really* don't want to go into some of the Omegaverse type stuff. Seriously, just forget you ever even heard that word.) Yes, the entire setup is rather unusual - the book goes through great pains to explore that exact facet of the relationship, and indeed much of the drama in this romcom is specifically due to the unusual nature of how our male and female leads meet and begin to interact.
Instead, most everything I've seen anyone complaining about in previous reviews of this book are largely played either for comedy or for enhancing the tension and drama, and both sides of this romantic comedy work quite well in their separate lanes, and indeed come together to make one of the more stand-out and interesting romcoms I've read in quite some time. Again, it won't be for everyone, for varying reasons. But for those that can allow your brains to accept this tale for just a few hours, you're going to come away with one of the more memorable romance tales I've read in literally years. Here, I speak as a man who reads on average 200 books per year across nearly all (non swords and sorcery fantasy) genres.
Even the standard inclusion of who the next couple in the series will be is done well by including them when it makes sense in *this* story, but not having them dominate the screen in their scenes the way I've seen others do over the years.
Spice level wise... y'all, breeding kink is a major thing here. Thus, the spice level is pretty well ghost pepper/ damn near erotica level at times, but with the main focus of the book being on the actual story. But when it goes to sex scenes... not only does it not fade to black, it gets into a lot of stuff that will make a lot of people fairly squeamish, and not always in good ways. So yet again, be prepared for this, and if this isn't really your thing... this book likely won't be for you, and that is perfectly ok.
Truly an unconventional and thus memorable romcom, but again, it won't be for everyone. *And that is perfectly ok.*
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Updated a reading goal:
Read 53 books in 2025
Progress so far: 75 / 53 142%
Orwellian. 1984 was originally published in 1949 - 76 yrs and 2 days before the publication of this book - and its final line in particular is echoed in this book. (Not revealing it here so as to avoid spoilers, though yes, *some* people - me, I am "some people" - will remember it exactly.)
Here, we get a very similar effect in the end, if not a retelling of the overall story of someone rebelling against a thing they are tied to in so many ways before being abused back into loving the thing they originally rebelled against. Obviously without the political commentary, as (as another reviewer noted), Rouda is clearly making a name for herself in the trainwreck popcorn thriller market. Why insert any overt politics and piss off whatever segment of potential readers, after all? :)
Thus, fans of Rouda will love this new entry. Those new to Rouda's writing will find a pretty spot on example of it here, at least in my reading of her last few books (though not all of them, yet). And yes, her style doesn't leave anyone looking particularly great or give the reader really anyone to "root for" 100%. Nobody is a truly "good" character, but all of the characters work reasonably well for their role in the story being told. And the story being told will have you on the edge of your seat much of the time, with little time for any "potty break" sections.
If you're looking for a darkly entertaining thriller with minimal blood or sex or even really cursing... you've found exactly that. If you're looking for something that is not pretty well exactly that... this ain't what you're looking for. It really is as simple as that, as is the case with pretty well every Rouda book. (Some may have more sex than others, some may have more cursing than others, but largely if you're ok with reading about people doing horrible things to each other, up to and including murder both onscreen and off... you're going to be ok here.)
Overall a darkly fun book that will be perfect summer reading for some, and that may be either too dark or even not dark enough for others.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Orwellian. 1984 was originally published in 1949 - 76 yrs and 2 days before the publication of this book - and its final line in particular is echoed in this book. (Not revealing it here so as to avoid spoilers, though yes, *some* people - me, I am "some people" - will remember it exactly.)
Here, we get a very similar effect in the end, if not a retelling of the overall story of someone rebelling against a thing they are tied to in so many ways before being abused back into loving the thing they originally rebelled against. Obviously without the political commentary, as (as another reviewer noted), Rouda is clearly making a name for herself in the trainwreck popcorn thriller market. Why insert any overt politics and piss off whatever segment of potential readers, after all? :)
Thus, fans of Rouda will love this new entry. Those new to Rouda's writing will find a pretty spot on example of it here, at least in my reading of her last few books (though not all of them, yet). And yes, her style doesn't leave anyone looking particularly great or give the reader really anyone to "root for" 100%. Nobody is a truly "good" character, but all of the characters work reasonably well for their role in the story being told. And the story being told will have you on the edge of your seat much of the time, with little time for any "potty break" sections.
If you're looking for a darkly entertaining thriller with minimal blood or sex or even really cursing... you've found exactly that. If you're looking for something that is not pretty well exactly that... this ain't what you're looking for. It really is as simple as that, as is the case with pretty well every Rouda book. (Some may have more sex than others, some may have more cursing than others, but largely if you're ok with reading about people doing horrible things to each other, up to and including murder both onscreen and off... you're going to be ok here.)
Overall a darkly fun book that will be perfect summer reading for some, and that may be either too dark or even not dark enough for others.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Added to listBookAnon.com Summer 2025 Reading Listwith 45 books.
Added to listARCs Currently TBRwith 47 books.
Workable Romcom With Slightly Too Much Bigotry. Ok, so I worded that title to get perhaps more eyeballs than a less confrontational title would have gotten. Here's the situation, and it is absolutely one that some will love and others will despise, so just be aware of it up front and make your own decision - but don't be mad at Schorr or me if you read the book and don't like it because of what I'm about to tell you, because if you read through the end of this review, YOU. HAVE. BEEN. WARNED.
The situation is this: There is an elderly character who reveals herself as bi and dates both men and women. Some will like this, some will stop reading right there and decide the book isn't for them. As I said, do what you will there.
My own issue, and the reason for the star deduction, is that this character has a more socially conservative son who is actively described as nothing but effectively pure evil. This particular character, always little more than a strawman as he never actually makes an appearance "on screen", is the closest thing to an antagonist the book has, and "strawman" really is the best term to use to describe him, as he is actively described as a bad person *specifically because of his conservative beliefs*, without ever allowing him on-screen to show a more fleshed out character. Now, my own standard for bigotry is both clear and consistent, as I've maintained it for my entire time as a book reviewer: Invert the demographics. If there is a problem, there is a problem in the original as well. Simple. Clear. Consistent. Here, if we made the LGBT character the evil one, off screen, with zero redemptive qualities and never giving that character a chance to be onscreen and defend itself... yeah, that book would have to be self published in today's market, and would still get the author cancelled. Thus, because there is a problem when we invert the demographics, there is a problem here - and thus, the star deduction.
But there again, there are many readers who will *love* that this character is portrayed in this manner - hell, there are some who will buy this book *specifically because* this character is portrayed in this manner. Again, dear reader of my review, you do you. My job is to discuss my own experience with the book and any issues I noted therein so that you can make the best decision for you, and I've done that here.
To be clear, other than the unnecessary inclusion of the character above, I thought this book worked reasonably well overall. Fans of romance novels/ romcoms, particularly of a Gilmore Girls type, will likely love this book. Those who think heavy pop culture references don't belong in pop culture items... likely won't like it as much. Readers looking for ghost pepper level spice/ a touch of drama with their sex scenes type of tales may not like this one as much, as the spice is closer to habanero or so, but also those who can't really tolerate much more than a warm glass of milk may also not like the spice that *is* present. Again, for my own personal tastes, the only two things that surprised me were the inclusion of the elderly bi character and the bigotry towards the socially conservative son - it is an interesting dynamic in that usually the child is the LGBT character and the parent is the socially conservative one. I thought the elderly character was done well, not forced at all, and played well in the story as presented. I simply wished the son were able to do the same.
One somewhat surprising thing about this book given my conversations on social media with Schorr after acquiring my Advance Review Copy of the book from NetGalley but before actually reading it is that Schorr was worried the book could be seen as "too Jewish". In reality, there is roughly a single scene or so where the actual Jewishness of some of the characters comes onscreen, and it worked well with the story told to that point. Again, some will have problems that there are Jewish characters here at all, despite no references to literally any country other than the United States (as this takes place in New York City with some scenes in Philadelphia, but even there, other than the bigotry noted above, even American politics isn't really discussed in the text here). Others will love that there are Jewish characters simply existing in New York. Again, you do you and make the right decision for you.
Just please don't 1 star this book over something I've already warned you about here. Do review the book though, and write about your own thoughts on the book. Maybe you think I'm an idiot. Feel free to call me out in your review. Maybe you think Schorr is an idiot. Don't be mean to her, but be honest about what you thought *without being mean*. (I don't care if you're mean to me, but authors are generally sensitive people. :D) Or maybe you think Schorr is awesome. Absolutely sing her praises if you think that. Authors love to see that. :) Me personally, I was disappointed in the presence of the one character, but overall I really do think Schorr is a talented writer, and I really do look forward to her future works. I just hope she can avoid repeating that one mistake. :)
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Workable Romcom With Slightly Too Much Bigotry. Ok, so I worded that title to get perhaps more eyeballs than a less confrontational title would have gotten. Here's the situation, and it is absolutely one that some will love and others will despise, so just be aware of it up front and make your own decision - but don't be mad at Schorr or me if you read the book and don't like it because of what I'm about to tell you, because if you read through the end of this review, YOU. HAVE. BEEN. WARNED.
The situation is this: There is an elderly character who reveals herself as bi and dates both men and women. Some will like this, some will stop reading right there and decide the book isn't for them. As I said, do what you will there.
My own issue, and the reason for the star deduction, is that this character has a more socially conservative son who is actively described as nothing but effectively pure evil. This particular character, always little more than a strawman as he never actually makes an appearance "on screen", is the closest thing to an antagonist the book has, and "strawman" really is the best term to use to describe him, as he is actively described as a bad person *specifically because of his conservative beliefs*, without ever allowing him on-screen to show a more fleshed out character. Now, my own standard for bigotry is both clear and consistent, as I've maintained it for my entire time as a book reviewer: Invert the demographics. If there is a problem, there is a problem in the original as well. Simple. Clear. Consistent. Here, if we made the LGBT character the evil one, off screen, with zero redemptive qualities and never giving that character a chance to be onscreen and defend itself... yeah, that book would have to be self published in today's market, and would still get the author cancelled. Thus, because there is a problem when we invert the demographics, there is a problem here - and thus, the star deduction.
But there again, there are many readers who will *love* that this character is portrayed in this manner - hell, there are some who will buy this book *specifically because* this character is portrayed in this manner. Again, dear reader of my review, you do you. My job is to discuss my own experience with the book and any issues I noted therein so that you can make the best decision for you, and I've done that here.
To be clear, other than the unnecessary inclusion of the character above, I thought this book worked reasonably well overall. Fans of romance novels/ romcoms, particularly of a Gilmore Girls type, will likely love this book. Those who think heavy pop culture references don't belong in pop culture items... likely won't like it as much. Readers looking for ghost pepper level spice/ a touch of drama with their sex scenes type of tales may not like this one as much, as the spice is closer to habanero or so, but also those who can't really tolerate much more than a warm glass of milk may also not like the spice that *is* present. Again, for my own personal tastes, the only two things that surprised me were the inclusion of the elderly bi character and the bigotry towards the socially conservative son - it is an interesting dynamic in that usually the child is the LGBT character and the parent is the socially conservative one. I thought the elderly character was done well, not forced at all, and played well in the story as presented. I simply wished the son were able to do the same.
One somewhat surprising thing about this book given my conversations on social media with Schorr after acquiring my Advance Review Copy of the book from NetGalley but before actually reading it is that Schorr was worried the book could be seen as "too Jewish". In reality, there is roughly a single scene or so where the actual Jewishness of some of the characters comes onscreen, and it worked well with the story told to that point. Again, some will have problems that there are Jewish characters here at all, despite no references to literally any country other than the United States (as this takes place in New York City with some scenes in Philadelphia, but even there, other than the bigotry noted above, even American politics isn't really discussed in the text here). Others will love that there are Jewish characters simply existing in New York. Again, you do you and make the right decision for you.
Just please don't 1 star this book over something I've already warned you about here. Do review the book though, and write about your own thoughts on the book. Maybe you think I'm an idiot. Feel free to call me out in your review. Maybe you think Schorr is an idiot. Don't be mean to her, but be honest about what you thought *without being mean*. (I don't care if you're mean to me, but authors are generally sensitive people. :D) Or maybe you think Schorr is awesome. Absolutely sing her praises if you think that. Authors love to see that. :) Me personally, I was disappointed in the presence of the one character, but overall I really do think Schorr is a talented writer, and I really do look forward to her future works. I just hope she can avoid repeating that one mistake. :)
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
More About Influencer / Hyper Online Culture Of The Last Decade And How To Manipulate The Algorithms To Increase Your Reach. This is one of those books where I suspect most people will go into it with one expectation - to learn about the etymology of various terms used online and how the creation and propagation of these terms is shaping the future of language.
Instead, what we largely get is a look at influencer and hyper-online culture of the last decade and tips on how to manipulate language so that the algorithms of social media don't shadow ban (or outright ban) you and even how to use them to gain more followers for yourself.
In and of itself, this is a rather fascinating look at what it actually is... but that isn't really what was "sold" to us in the (current, one month to the day before publication) description of the book. But is it *quite* enough to justify a star deduction in and of itself? Normally, possibly, but here I'll allow it simply because Aleksic does do a truly great job of explaining what he actually wants to explain... even if this isn't what the description of the book (which isn't controlled exclusively by Aleksic) wants us to believe the book is about.
Thus, the star deduction here is actually for the dearth of even really a modicum of a bibliography, at least in the Advance Review Copy of the book I read. Perhaps the final form will include one, and perhaps that bibliography will be roughly 15% or more of the overall text. That would be *awesome* - but that is NOT the version of the book I read, and thus is not the version of the book I must judge.
Overall truly an eye opening book roughly about linguistics and etymology, but really more about influencer culture and how to manipulate the algorithms to your own personal gain, this one will be one that will likely fly about that high - perhaps gaining a modicum of attention for a few moments, before the algorithm instead pushes the next Big Thing.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
More About Influencer / Hyper Online Culture Of The Last Decade And How To Manipulate The Algorithms To Increase Your Reach. This is one of those books where I suspect most people will go into it with one expectation - to learn about the etymology of various terms used online and how the creation and propagation of these terms is shaping the future of language.
Instead, what we largely get is a look at influencer and hyper-online culture of the last decade and tips on how to manipulate language so that the algorithms of social media don't shadow ban (or outright ban) you and even how to use them to gain more followers for yourself.
In and of itself, this is a rather fascinating look at what it actually is... but that isn't really what was "sold" to us in the (current, one month to the day before publication) description of the book. But is it *quite* enough to justify a star deduction in and of itself? Normally, possibly, but here I'll allow it simply because Aleksic does do a truly great job of explaining what he actually wants to explain... even if this isn't what the description of the book (which isn't controlled exclusively by Aleksic) wants us to believe the book is about.
Thus, the star deduction here is actually for the dearth of even really a modicum of a bibliography, at least in the Advance Review Copy of the book I read. Perhaps the final form will include one, and perhaps that bibliography will be roughly 15% or more of the overall text. That would be *awesome* - but that is NOT the version of the book I read, and thus is not the version of the book I must judge.
Overall truly an eye opening book roughly about linguistics and etymology, but really more about influencer culture and how to manipulate the algorithms to your own personal gain, this one will be one that will likely fly about that high - perhaps gaining a modicum of attention for a few moments, before the algorithm instead pushes the next Big Thing.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Solid Explanation Of Why Knowing The Basics Of Software Development Is Essential In Modern Life. Full disclosure up front: My degree is in Computer Science. I actually started the program at 16 years old and was already going into Programming 3 by the time I graduated high school. I spent over three years in college as a Programming 1 tutor, having never made less than a 95 on *any* assignment or test - including the handwritten final exam - in Programming 1. I was a middle school/ high school teacher for a year before spending the last 18 years as a professional software developer building everything from credit card processing applications at a Fortune 50 megacorporation to various medical billing systems to even a couple of stints at the Savannah River Site as a nuclear software engineer on various projects, including one that informed the chemical engineers of when any one of a couple dozen nuclear waste tanks ranging in size from a few hundred thousand gallons to over a million gallons were about to explode within 24 hours if they didn't act in time.
All that to say, obviously, I love my craft. I'm a 25+ year student of this industry as well as practitioner, and I've learned, done, and seen quite a bit. I *know* how critical my industry is to modern life.
Here, Arbesman does a truly remarkable job of explaining to everyone *else* what I've known for quite some time. No matter your background outside of software development - including those non-coders inside of the more general Information Technology industry - Arbesman does a truly great job of explaining the basics of coding and why it is important to modern life - both for good and ill - in such a way that it is both easily approachable and easily understandable by pretty well anyone who can read at all.
Reasonably well documented - at least by my more recent, more relaxed standards - at 15% or so, this book explains the wonders and pitfalls of this industry in ways that will make most anyone understand just how critical it is and why it is critically important that they have at least some understanding of it... and also make those of us who have been in the trenches for quite some time come to love what we do all over again. It is both informed and inspiring, and while it doesn't go into all of the complexities of the field, it does give a solid overview of at least a lot of the key issues in such a way that it invites the reader to discover even more about this industry.
Overall a great book for anyone, and seemingly destined to be at minimum suggested reading - if not required - in perhaps a lot of Computer 101 courses in college or even high school.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Solid Explanation Of Why Knowing The Basics Of Software Development Is Essential In Modern Life. Full disclosure up front: My degree is in Computer Science. I actually started the program at 16 years old and was already going into Programming 3 by the time I graduated high school. I spent over three years in college as a Programming 1 tutor, having never made less than a 95 on *any* assignment or test - including the handwritten final exam - in Programming 1. I was a middle school/ high school teacher for a year before spending the last 18 years as a professional software developer building everything from credit card processing applications at a Fortune 50 megacorporation to various medical billing systems to even a couple of stints at the Savannah River Site as a nuclear software engineer on various projects, including one that informed the chemical engineers of when any one of a couple dozen nuclear waste tanks ranging in size from a few hundred thousand gallons to over a million gallons were about to explode within 24 hours if they didn't act in time.
All that to say, obviously, I love my craft. I'm a 25+ year student of this industry as well as practitioner, and I've learned, done, and seen quite a bit. I *know* how critical my industry is to modern life.
Here, Arbesman does a truly remarkable job of explaining to everyone *else* what I've known for quite some time. No matter your background outside of software development - including those non-coders inside of the more general Information Technology industry - Arbesman does a truly great job of explaining the basics of coding and why it is important to modern life - both for good and ill - in such a way that it is both easily approachable and easily understandable by pretty well anyone who can read at all.
Reasonably well documented - at least by my more recent, more relaxed standards - at 15% or so, this book explains the wonders and pitfalls of this industry in ways that will make most anyone understand just how critical it is and why it is critically important that they have at least some understanding of it... and also make those of us who have been in the trenches for quite some time come to love what we do all over again. It is both informed and inspiring, and while it doesn't go into all of the complexities of the field, it does give a solid overview of at least a lot of the key issues in such a way that it invites the reader to discover even more about this industry.
Overall a great book for anyone, and seemingly destined to be at minimum suggested reading - if not required - in perhaps a lot of Computer 101 courses in college or even high school.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Strong Small Town Tale. This is one of those tales that has a bit of a lot. Rich boy falls in love with trailer park trash girl over the course of one fateful teenage summer. Events happen in their small seasonal town, and small seasonal townspeople - including police - respond as small seasonable townspeople all too often do, even in real life.
But what if... what if damn near *everyone* was wrong?
What if the truth of that summer all those years ago was so much more complex? What if virtually *no one* had anywhere near a complete picture of what was happening, due to *everyone* having far too many prejudices and preconceptions?
Can wrongs done that summer all those years ago be corrected all this time later - at least to some degree or another? Can relationships destroyed then - family, community, romantically, and others - be repaired after so much time has passed and so much bitterness has been so deeply internalized?
Novak here provides a stunning tale perfect for summer reading that delves into all of the above in a tale that ultimately leaves the reader a bit breathless and a lot of emotions to deal with. It isn't a comedy, though it has a touch of that. It isn't a romance per se, though it does in fact meet all known qualifications there and may be marketed as such. This is far more a family/ small town drama, and one that plays out quite remarkably well.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Strong Small Town Tale. This is one of those tales that has a bit of a lot. Rich boy falls in love with trailer park trash girl over the course of one fateful teenage summer. Events happen in their small seasonal town, and small seasonal townspeople - including police - respond as small seasonable townspeople all too often do, even in real life.
But what if... what if damn near *everyone* was wrong?
What if the truth of that summer all those years ago was so much more complex? What if virtually *no one* had anywhere near a complete picture of what was happening, due to *everyone* having far too many prejudices and preconceptions?
Can wrongs done that summer all those years ago be corrected all this time later - at least to some degree or another? Can relationships destroyed then - family, community, romantically, and others - be repaired after so much time has passed and so much bitterness has been so deeply internalized?
Novak here provides a stunning tale perfect for summer reading that delves into all of the above in a tale that ultimately leaves the reader a bit breathless and a lot of emotions to deal with. It isn't a comedy, though it has a touch of that. It isn't a romance per se, though it does in fact meet all known qualifications there and may be marketed as such. This is far more a family/ small town drama, and one that plays out quite remarkably well.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Hitler In Heaven, Pope Francis In Hell, And The Surprising Connection To Why Santa Claus Is The Best Missionary In The History Of Christianity. Got your attention with that title, right? And I know you're asking, seriously, dude? Hitler? THAT Hitler? In Heaven???? And the recently deceased Pope Francis, the freaking POPE, the HEAD OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH POPE, in Hell????
And what, by God, does either one of those things have to do with Santa Claus AT ALL?????
Well... you need to read this book. :D (Though to be clear, I *did* modify Holloway's premise for purposes of this review. In the text, Holloway actually uses Mother Teresa rather than Pope Francis, but I thought Pope Francis was more relevant to the current moment while serving the exact same purpose. :) ) I fully cop to the simple fact that the title of this review and indeed most of it to this point is openly written to attempt to trigger the Outrage Machine (as Tobias Rose-Stockwell called it in his book of the same name almost two years to the day before this book is released) / Algospeak (as Adam Aleksic proclaims it in his book of the same name releasing on the same day as this book). My duty as a reviewer is first to be completely honest about my thoughts on a given book, but second to do everything in my power to help promote my review of the book (and thus the book itself), so this is an experiment in that line of thinking.
Seriously, this book is all about the pros and cons of Santa Claus, as seen by an ordained Baptist minister who actively dons the red and white suit every year and openly professes his love of (nearly) all things Christmas and Santa.
Yet even though Holloway is quite open with his natural bias here, he is also quite thorough in looking through the common complaints of Santa and examining each in turn - both from the left ("shaming isn't cool, y'all, and we need to protect the feelings of the young flowers") and from the right ("Heresy!!! There is NOTHING about Santa in the Bible!!!"). And Holloway truly does a pretty even handed look at all aspects of the complaints at hand, writing as both defense lawyer and prosecutor of both sides. Truly, it works quite well and since he uses a very conversational tone, it also reads quite easily.
Further, at barely 150 pages, this is also a very *quick* read - I read it in under 3 hrs, and that included getting a few chores done around the house preparing for my sister in law to arrive later today as I write this review.
Truly, anyone interested in any form of Christmas - even the secular, Santa/ Rudolph only version - will appreciate the overall discussion here, as while this *is* an explicitly Christian book and Holloway explicitly talks about using his time in the suit to spread the Christian message - part of the whole "best missionary in the history of Christianity bit", though read the book to see what Holloway does with this and how carefully and sensitively he approaches it - this is truly a book that looks at several non-religious arguments for and against Santa as well, and these discussions could be beneficial to even the most ardent secularist/ anti-Christian.
Indeed, the *only* reason for the star deduction is that even though Holloway does include at least some footnotes at the end of each chapter, they're all brief enough that I daresay they wouldn't quite get to the 15% or so of the text that even my recently relaxed bibliographic standards require in order to get the full amount of stars in the rating.
Truly an well written quick read that does everything it sets out to do... and maybe a bit more.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Hitler In Heaven, Pope Francis In Hell, And The Surprising Connection To Why Santa Claus Is The Best Missionary In The History Of Christianity. Got your attention with that title, right? And I know you're asking, seriously, dude? Hitler? THAT Hitler? In Heaven???? And the recently deceased Pope Francis, the freaking POPE, the HEAD OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH POPE, in Hell????
And what, by God, does either one of those things have to do with Santa Claus AT ALL?????
Well... you need to read this book. :D (Though to be clear, I *did* modify Holloway's premise for purposes of this review. In the text, Holloway actually uses Mother Teresa rather than Pope Francis, but I thought Pope Francis was more relevant to the current moment while serving the exact same purpose. :) ) I fully cop to the simple fact that the title of this review and indeed most of it to this point is openly written to attempt to trigger the Outrage Machine (as Tobias Rose-Stockwell called it in his book of the same name almost two years to the day before this book is released) / Algospeak (as Adam Aleksic proclaims it in his book of the same name releasing on the same day as this book). My duty as a reviewer is first to be completely honest about my thoughts on a given book, but second to do everything in my power to help promote my review of the book (and thus the book itself), so this is an experiment in that line of thinking.
Seriously, this book is all about the pros and cons of Santa Claus, as seen by an ordained Baptist minister who actively dons the red and white suit every year and openly professes his love of (nearly) all things Christmas and Santa.
Yet even though Holloway is quite open with his natural bias here, he is also quite thorough in looking through the common complaints of Santa and examining each in turn - both from the left ("shaming isn't cool, y'all, and we need to protect the feelings of the young flowers") and from the right ("Heresy!!! There is NOTHING about Santa in the Bible!!!"). And Holloway truly does a pretty even handed look at all aspects of the complaints at hand, writing as both defense lawyer and prosecutor of both sides. Truly, it works quite well and since he uses a very conversational tone, it also reads quite easily.
Further, at barely 150 pages, this is also a very *quick* read - I read it in under 3 hrs, and that included getting a few chores done around the house preparing for my sister in law to arrive later today as I write this review.
Truly, anyone interested in any form of Christmas - even the secular, Santa/ Rudolph only version - will appreciate the overall discussion here, as while this *is* an explicitly Christian book and Holloway explicitly talks about using his time in the suit to spread the Christian message - part of the whole "best missionary in the history of Christianity bit", though read the book to see what Holloway does with this and how carefully and sensitively he approaches it - this is truly a book that looks at several non-religious arguments for and against Santa as well, and these discussions could be beneficial to even the most ardent secularist/ anti-Christian.
Indeed, the *only* reason for the star deduction is that even though Holloway does include at least some footnotes at the end of each chapter, they're all brief enough that I daresay they wouldn't quite get to the 15% or so of the text that even my recently relaxed bibliographic standards require in order to get the full amount of stars in the rating.
Truly an well written quick read that does everything it sets out to do... and maybe a bit more.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Added to listBookAnon.com Summer 2025 Reading Listwith 44 books.
Complex Story of Generational Trauma. This is one of those tales that reads a touch slow - so be prepared for that - but which ultimately succeeds in having quite an emotional impact due to just how much force it lands with. When, to bring a bit of physics into the equation here, Force is mass multiplied by acceleration, a slow acceleration of a sufficiently sized mass can hit with the same impact as a much faster, yet smaller, object. This book's ultimate mass, all that has happened to each of these characters and all they have gone through as a result of these events, is truly rather substantial. In the end, you're going to see clearly just how these characters became all that they did... even as you may not quite get all the answers you may want as a reader, or perhaps things ultimately play out a touch differently here than you may want in "real life". Regardless, this book stays true to its story as Clark chooses to craft it, and she truly did a particularly great job yet again.
Yes, there is praise for both AOC and Kamala Harris within this text, so there will be some who love it for that alone and others who wish to defenestrate it for that alone, but I can also state that other than one character actively praising an event that is current for that character, the AOC/ Kamala lines in particular are one-offs and not truly central to the story.
Of at least slightly more concern, perhaps still not enough to deduct a star, yet enough to note in the review, is that this *is* yet another book where most straight males are written as antagonists and vile and evil - and yes, combined with the AOC/ Kamala line... again, could be divisive. But while annoying, it also works within the context of this tale as told, and is actually at least used well to enhance the impact of the overall story. Along these lines, there *is* also a gay married couple present, so do with that as you will. Again, I know some will love this and others will want to defenestrate the book over it, so you do you. I for one thought these characters were, again, worked into the story quite well and didn't seem as forced as I've seen these types of characters be in other tales by other authors, so it was neither here nor there for me.
Ultimately there is enough in this tale that various people won't like it for various side reasons. Read the book anyway for the actual main storyline... and maybe be prepared for the room to get quite dusty at a couple of points in particular.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Complex Story of Generational Trauma. This is one of those tales that reads a touch slow - so be prepared for that - but which ultimately succeeds in having quite an emotional impact due to just how much force it lands with. When, to bring a bit of physics into the equation here, Force is mass multiplied by acceleration, a slow acceleration of a sufficiently sized mass can hit with the same impact as a much faster, yet smaller, object. This book's ultimate mass, all that has happened to each of these characters and all they have gone through as a result of these events, is truly rather substantial. In the end, you're going to see clearly just how these characters became all that they did... even as you may not quite get all the answers you may want as a reader, or perhaps things ultimately play out a touch differently here than you may want in "real life". Regardless, this book stays true to its story as Clark chooses to craft it, and she truly did a particularly great job yet again.
Yes, there is praise for both AOC and Kamala Harris within this text, so there will be some who love it for that alone and others who wish to defenestrate it for that alone, but I can also state that other than one character actively praising an event that is current for that character, the AOC/ Kamala lines in particular are one-offs and not truly central to the story.
Of at least slightly more concern, perhaps still not enough to deduct a star, yet enough to note in the review, is that this *is* yet another book where most straight males are written as antagonists and vile and evil - and yes, combined with the AOC/ Kamala line... again, could be divisive. But while annoying, it also works within the context of this tale as told, and is actually at least used well to enhance the impact of the overall story. Along these lines, there *is* also a gay married couple present, so do with that as you will. Again, I know some will love this and others will want to defenestrate the book over it, so you do you. I for one thought these characters were, again, worked into the story quite well and didn't seem as forced as I've seen these types of characters be in other tales by other authors, so it was neither here nor there for me.
Ultimately there is enough in this tale that various people won't like it for various side reasons. Read the book anyway for the actual main storyline... and maybe be prepared for the room to get quite dusty at a couple of points in particular.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
One Of The Hardest Hitting 'Glimpse' Tales I've Ever Come Across. This is one of those 'glimpse' tales - ala The Family Man (the 2000s era movie with Nic Cage and Tea Leoni) or It's A Wonderful Life, and yet in its specific mechanics, it hit me harder than any I've come across before it. There are really only two books I've come across before - that I believe I've written reviews for over the years - that even come close, but revealing which two gets way too close to spoiler territory. So read this book then look back through my reviews (available on Hardcover.app, BookHype.com, PageBound.co, TheStoryGraph, Goodreads, or my blog at BookAnon.com) and see if you can make the connection yourself. :D (Ok, so *no one* is going to do that. But it could be a fun challenge for someone who is particularly bored, maybe? :D) Also, don't forget to leave your own review of this book after you read it. *Then* go look through mine. :D
But seriously, this is an utterly hilarious book that happens to have a lot of heart - both of which are hallmarks of this type of tale, and both of which are done particularly well by Harbison.
The selection of exact characterization here helps - a regular girl from Florida who has two different dreams which ultimately become two different realities one day such that she gets to live through both and see what both are really like. Yes, there is a fair amount of Hollywood name dropping and commentary, but again, I've seen that in many other books with similar characters, and it works well to establish this exact characterization early, particularly since the real 'meat' of the book is actually the *other* life.
What made this hit so hard personally was an event I don't speak much of publicly, but which has direct bearing on this book - but again, I have to be very vague here in order to avoid spoilers. Suffice it to say that my reality - assuming the one I'm typing this review in *is* reality - wound up very different from the one in the book, yet it is also all *too* easy for me to see how my reality could have been a version of this tale, all the way to me becoming a version of our lead character. (Though to be clear, *no one* is casting me as an actor. The one time I acted at all was in a HS play - Midsummer Night's Dream - and even playing a character who was *supposed* to be a bad actor... damn, I was *really* bad at even that!)
If you've never encountered a 'glimpse' tale, this is genuinely one of the better ones I've come across, particularly in the last few years, so it is a great place to start. Long time fans of the type of tale, like me, will likely enjoy this particular tale quite a bit too.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
One Of The Hardest Hitting 'Glimpse' Tales I've Ever Come Across. This is one of those 'glimpse' tales - ala The Family Man (the 2000s era movie with Nic Cage and Tea Leoni) or It's A Wonderful Life, and yet in its specific mechanics, it hit me harder than any I've come across before it. There are really only two books I've come across before - that I believe I've written reviews for over the years - that even come close, but revealing which two gets way too close to spoiler territory. So read this book then look back through my reviews (available on Hardcover.app, BookHype.com, PageBound.co, TheStoryGraph, Goodreads, or my blog at BookAnon.com) and see if you can make the connection yourself. :D (Ok, so *no one* is going to do that. But it could be a fun challenge for someone who is particularly bored, maybe? :D) Also, don't forget to leave your own review of this book after you read it. *Then* go look through mine. :D
But seriously, this is an utterly hilarious book that happens to have a lot of heart - both of which are hallmarks of this type of tale, and both of which are done particularly well by Harbison.
The selection of exact characterization here helps - a regular girl from Florida who has two different dreams which ultimately become two different realities one day such that she gets to live through both and see what both are really like. Yes, there is a fair amount of Hollywood name dropping and commentary, but again, I've seen that in many other books with similar characters, and it works well to establish this exact characterization early, particularly since the real 'meat' of the book is actually the *other* life.
What made this hit so hard personally was an event I don't speak much of publicly, but which has direct bearing on this book - but again, I have to be very vague here in order to avoid spoilers. Suffice it to say that my reality - assuming the one I'm typing this review in *is* reality - wound up very different from the one in the book, yet it is also all *too* easy for me to see how my reality could have been a version of this tale, all the way to me becoming a version of our lead character. (Though to be clear, *no one* is casting me as an actor. The one time I acted at all was in a HS play - Midsummer Night's Dream - and even playing a character who was *supposed* to be a bad actor... damn, I was *really* bad at even that!)
If you've never encountered a 'glimpse' tale, this is genuinely one of the better ones I've come across, particularly in the last few years, so it is a great place to start. Long time fans of the type of tale, like me, will likely enjoy this particular tale quite a bit too.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Not So Hidden, Yet Authors Explain In Ways Perhaps Others Have Not Considered. This is one of those books that reads as though you've always known exactly what the authors are presenting... you just never considered actually breaking it out exactly like this. Part Corporate Leadership, part Corporate Ethics, and part Self Help, it is a guide to thinking ethically even in tough situations - lest you find yourself and your company embroiled in scandals as infamous as the ones detailed herein (and others far less famous, yet impactful).
Speaking as someone who *has* worked in one of the largest companies in the world (a global megacorporation generally in the lower half of the Fortune 50 the entire time I worked there), this is one that corporate leaders are going to *love* so that they can claim they are doing something about corporate ethics/ education... so we'll see how much those same companies really take to heart the actual message of this text and truly make changes across the board, rather than just dictating to crew dogs some (usually not completely thought out, at least at the lowest levels) written in stone and just as hard to adapt rules to follow that will change with the next corporate ethics book Leadership reads. Hell, maybe they can even save some money and just buy a lot of copies of this book rather than hiring expensive "consultants" to tell them the exact same thing... *because they read this book*.
But seriously, having been involved in the mentorship program at that employer as a mentor to more junior colleagues, this is absolutely a book I would have recommended they read, and indeed even in my current role where I also help mentor a junior colleague, I'm absolutely going to recommend this book to both my boss and my colleague. It really does lay things out quite clearly, at least so far as its framework goes.
The one criticism I have, though not rising quite to the level of a star deduction, is that its application of its framework can feel at times forced and at other times a touch too heavy handed or even myopic. Yes, it *technically* fits with both Enron and Theranos as described... but there were absolutely other factors in both of those situations that were just as critical to their scandals that *don't* fit the overall framework as neatly which were ignored or explained away with essentially a hand wave.
But read this book anyway. It really is quite solid, and it absolutely gives off the "I always knew this" impression... even when you clearly didn't think of it in these exact terms or framework, and these exact terms and framework may indeed help you to be a more ethical worker and leader.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Not So Hidden, Yet Authors Explain In Ways Perhaps Others Have Not Considered. This is one of those books that reads as though you've always known exactly what the authors are presenting... you just never considered actually breaking it out exactly like this. Part Corporate Leadership, part Corporate Ethics, and part Self Help, it is a guide to thinking ethically even in tough situations - lest you find yourself and your company embroiled in scandals as infamous as the ones detailed herein (and others far less famous, yet impactful).
Speaking as someone who *has* worked in one of the largest companies in the world (a global megacorporation generally in the lower half of the Fortune 50 the entire time I worked there), this is one that corporate leaders are going to *love* so that they can claim they are doing something about corporate ethics/ education... so we'll see how much those same companies really take to heart the actual message of this text and truly make changes across the board, rather than just dictating to crew dogs some (usually not completely thought out, at least at the lowest levels) written in stone and just as hard to adapt rules to follow that will change with the next corporate ethics book Leadership reads. Hell, maybe they can even save some money and just buy a lot of copies of this book rather than hiring expensive "consultants" to tell them the exact same thing... *because they read this book*.
But seriously, having been involved in the mentorship program at that employer as a mentor to more junior colleagues, this is absolutely a book I would have recommended they read, and indeed even in my current role where I also help mentor a junior colleague, I'm absolutely going to recommend this book to both my boss and my colleague. It really does lay things out quite clearly, at least so far as its framework goes.
The one criticism I have, though not rising quite to the level of a star deduction, is that its application of its framework can feel at times forced and at other times a touch too heavy handed or even myopic. Yes, it *technically* fits with both Enron and Theranos as described... but there were absolutely other factors in both of those situations that were just as critical to their scandals that *don't* fit the overall framework as neatly which were ignored or explained away with essentially a hand wave.
But read this book anyway. It really is quite solid, and it absolutely gives off the "I always knew this" impression... even when you clearly didn't think of it in these exact terms or framework, and these exact terms and framework may indeed help you to be a more ethical worker and leader.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Among The More Complete Histories Of The Nuclear Bombing Of Japan. Clocking in at nearly 450 pages, with only about 10% of that bibliography - and hence the star deduction - this account really is one of the more complete accounts of the entire event I've yet come across in all my years both reading books generally and studying WWII in its various facets more specifically. It was also the last of three books about the bomb and/ or the use of it that I read over the few days of US Memorial Day Weekend 2025 or in the days immediately after, the other two being Evan Thomas' 2023 book Road To Surrender and Frank Close's June 2025 book Destroyer Of Worlds.
Specifically, in tracking exactly who it does - including several key US personnel involved with both war planning and the Manhattan Project itself, the pilot of the bomber that dropped the bomb on Hiroshima, the reporter who really opened America's eyes to the horrors of nuclear fallout, and even the Mayor of Hiroshima himself - this book really does give a complete all around picture of all aspects of the creation and use of the atomic bomb and the repercussions for both American leadership and Japanese civilians.
Reading almost like a Tom Clancy or perhaps Robert Ludlum war thriller at times, this text *also* manages to have the emotional heavy hitting of Hersey's original Hiroshima report, which it covers in nearly as much detail as Lesley MM Blume's 2020 book Fallout - which told the story of that report exclusively. Leaning more towards the American position that as horrific as this event was, it very likely saved lives - American, Japanese, and even Russian - this is one of those texts that largely doesn't speak of the efforts in both America and Japan by several key, yet not quite highly ranked enough, leaders to at least consider trying to end the war through dialogue (ala Evan Thomas' 2023 book Road To Surrender), but instead seeks to offer the reader a more complete understanding of the men who *were* making the decisions in these moments, from the President of the United States all the way to the commander of the airplane that actually dropped the bomb itself.
Ultimately a thorough yet sobering account, and with its release intentionally timed just barely a month before the 80th anniversary of the Hiroshima bombing, this really is one of the most complete books I've ever encountered on the topic, one that at least attempts to strive for a balance in understanding *all* involved in this event. Thus, all -American, Japanese, and everyone else interested in discussing the event with intelligence and facts - would do well to read this particular accounting.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Among The More Complete Histories Of The Nuclear Bombing Of Japan. Clocking in at nearly 450 pages, with only about 10% of that bibliography - and hence the star deduction - this account really is one of the more complete accounts of the entire event I've yet come across in all my years both reading books generally and studying WWII in its various facets more specifically. It was also the last of three books about the bomb and/ or the use of it that I read over the few days of US Memorial Day Weekend 2025 or in the days immediately after, the other two being Evan Thomas' 2023 book Road To Surrender and Frank Close's June 2025 book Destroyer Of Worlds.
Specifically, in tracking exactly who it does - including several key US personnel involved with both war planning and the Manhattan Project itself, the pilot of the bomber that dropped the bomb on Hiroshima, the reporter who really opened America's eyes to the horrors of nuclear fallout, and even the Mayor of Hiroshima himself - this book really does give a complete all around picture of all aspects of the creation and use of the atomic bomb and the repercussions for both American leadership and Japanese civilians.
Reading almost like a Tom Clancy or perhaps Robert Ludlum war thriller at times, this text *also* manages to have the emotional heavy hitting of Hersey's original Hiroshima report, which it covers in nearly as much detail as Lesley MM Blume's 2020 book Fallout - which told the story of that report exclusively. Leaning more towards the American position that as horrific as this event was, it very likely saved lives - American, Japanese, and even Russian - this is one of those texts that largely doesn't speak of the efforts in both America and Japan by several key, yet not quite highly ranked enough, leaders to at least consider trying to end the war through dialogue (ala Evan Thomas' 2023 book Road To Surrender), but instead seeks to offer the reader a more complete understanding of the men who *were* making the decisions in these moments, from the President of the United States all the way to the commander of the airplane that actually dropped the bomb itself.
Ultimately a thorough yet sobering account, and with its release intentionally timed just barely a month before the 80th anniversary of the Hiroshima bombing, this really is one of the most complete books I've ever encountered on the topic, one that at least attempts to strive for a balance in understanding *all* involved in this event. Thus, all -American, Japanese, and everyone else interested in discussing the event with intelligence and facts - would do well to read this particular accounting.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Despite Title, This Is A Physics History - Not A WWII History. Despite using J. Robert Oppenheimer's famous quote upon seeing the detonation of the first atomic bomb - quoting from the Bhagavad Gita, he proclaimed "I am become death, the destroyer of worlds" (in case you've been living under a rock and had never heard that tale) - and indeed even showing that moment in this history of physics, this really is exactly that - a history of nuclear physics and the scientists involved.
Even when the book finally gets into WWII and the Manhattan Project - as well as at least touching on both Germany and Japan's efforts to also create the first atom bomb - it still primarily focuses on the science, scientists, and the technical, logistical, and political challenges they were having. Indeed, this is really as close as this text gets to discussing the larger picture of WWII - or the Cold War after it ended.
Instead what we get is a fascinating, and perhaps first of its kind in just how detailed and comprehensive it is, examination of the history of scientific discovery as it relates to nuclear and even quantum physics. Yes, it has a lot of complex - as in, truly seemingly PhD level in the field - images of some of the various mathematical equations involved, but Close does a pretty great job of actually explaining them in such a way that someone with at least a high school physics class under their belt should be able to follow along reasonably well, and even for those that don't have even that background in physics, it really is more "history of physics" than "physics" in the text's actual discussions of the relevant histories. (Though I could absolutely see this being used as a textbook, particularly at the collegiate level and particularly in certain history classes or even physics classes, as a way of showing all that has come before to get us to roughly where we are in our understanding of the topics at hand.)
At least I had an easy enough time following along with the text here- though as others frequently tell me, this could very well be a "*my* abilities" thing rather than a more general level of ease. So please, read this book and write a review yourself, no matter who you may be, and please briefly describe your own educational background when you do. (For me, I have a Bachelor's degree in Computer Science, came within a handful of classes of getting two other degrees in Secondary Mathematics Education and Mathematics -long story there - and had physics classes in both high school and college. In addition to several history classes, including a few covering the time and issues in question.) I also had a great time reading this over US Memorial Weekend 2025, as we prepare for the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki later this summer - though I *did* expect this book would be more about those events than it was, which was one main reason I had originally picked it up and chose to read it at this exact time. So again, to be crystal clear yet another time: This is a history of nuclear physics, *NOT* a history of the atomic bomb directly or exclusively.
Truly a fascinating and compelling history, particularly for anyone at least remotely interested in the field for any reason.
Oh, and the star deduction? For all that is discussed here, the bibliography is actually rather short, clocking in at just 10% or so of the text. Astonishing, really, considering the sheer amount of history presented here.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Despite Title, This Is A Physics History - Not A WWII History. Despite using J. Robert Oppenheimer's famous quote upon seeing the detonation of the first atomic bomb - quoting from the Bhagavad Gita, he proclaimed "I am become death, the destroyer of worlds" (in case you've been living under a rock and had never heard that tale) - and indeed even showing that moment in this history of physics, this really is exactly that - a history of nuclear physics and the scientists involved.
Even when the book finally gets into WWII and the Manhattan Project - as well as at least touching on both Germany and Japan's efforts to also create the first atom bomb - it still primarily focuses on the science, scientists, and the technical, logistical, and political challenges they were having. Indeed, this is really as close as this text gets to discussing the larger picture of WWII - or the Cold War after it ended.
Instead what we get is a fascinating, and perhaps first of its kind in just how detailed and comprehensive it is, examination of the history of scientific discovery as it relates to nuclear and even quantum physics. Yes, it has a lot of complex - as in, truly seemingly PhD level in the field - images of some of the various mathematical equations involved, but Close does a pretty great job of actually explaining them in such a way that someone with at least a high school physics class under their belt should be able to follow along reasonably well, and even for those that don't have even that background in physics, it really is more "history of physics" than "physics" in the text's actual discussions of the relevant histories. (Though I could absolutely see this being used as a textbook, particularly at the collegiate level and particularly in certain history classes or even physics classes, as a way of showing all that has come before to get us to roughly where we are in our understanding of the topics at hand.)
At least I had an easy enough time following along with the text here- though as others frequently tell me, this could very well be a "*my* abilities" thing rather than a more general level of ease. So please, read this book and write a review yourself, no matter who you may be, and please briefly describe your own educational background when you do. (For me, I have a Bachelor's degree in Computer Science, came within a handful of classes of getting two other degrees in Secondary Mathematics Education and Mathematics -long story there - and had physics classes in both high school and college. In addition to several history classes, including a few covering the time and issues in question.) I also had a great time reading this over US Memorial Weekend 2025, as we prepare for the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki later this summer - though I *did* expect this book would be more about those events than it was, which was one main reason I had originally picked it up and chose to read it at this exact time. So again, to be crystal clear yet another time: This is a history of nuclear physics, *NOT* a history of the atomic bomb directly or exclusively.
Truly a fascinating and compelling history, particularly for anyone at least remotely interested in the field for any reason.
Oh, and the star deduction? For all that is discussed here, the bibliography is actually rather short, clocking in at just 10% or so of the text. Astonishing, really, considering the sheer amount of history presented here.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Added to listOwnedwith 79 books.
History In All Its Complexity. This is one of the better histories of the nuclear bombings of Japan that I've come across over the years in that it isn't "hoo-rah we didn't drop *enough* bombs on Japan!", but it also isn't "nuclear weapons are an absolute abomination and their use made the term "war crime" seem like stealing a piece of gum, it was so much worse than that". (The second there being closer to my own position on the matter, for what that's worth.)
Instead, Thomas takes pains to show the complex realities on both sides of the war, both in what the leaders at the time knew and in the various pressures each was facing in trying to lead nations during a war. This is a Western-based book, and thus ultimately comes down on the side of the deployment of these weapons being "necessary", but Thomas really shows effort to show that at least some of the American leaders that ultimately selected the targets and ordered the strikes did at least attempt to consider other alternatives - but again, given their own intelligence estimates, planning, and pressures, ultimately concluded to issue the orders they did.
One thing that becomes crystal clear when reading this text, however, is that while there may not have been (apparently clearly were not) actual communications regarding this between the governments, there absolutely were people - high ranking people - on both sides that were seeking ways to avoid this fate. There were those on the American side high enough up to know what was being built in top secrecy but low enough to not be able to countermand the order to actually use them that wanted to avoid civilian deaths at *all* costs - even if it meant not dropping these bombs at all. There were those on the Japanese side that were striving, as early as late 1944 in particular, to find some way to end the war and still allow Japan to retain its Imperial system, or at bare minimum its Emperor. (Which, to be clear, despite the US "insisting" on "unconditional" surrender, *was* ultimately allowed - and yes, Thomas goes into detail here too about what the terms actually meant to both sides.)
Truly one of the better histories of the topic I've ever come across, and I'm glad I finally read this text on US Memorial Weekend 2025, as we begin to go through the 80th anniversary of many of the final events detailed in this book.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
History In All Its Complexity. This is one of the better histories of the nuclear bombings of Japan that I've come across over the years in that it isn't "hoo-rah we didn't drop *enough* bombs on Japan!", but it also isn't "nuclear weapons are an absolute abomination and their use made the term "war crime" seem like stealing a piece of gum, it was so much worse than that". (The second there being closer to my own position on the matter, for what that's worth.)
Instead, Thomas takes pains to show the complex realities on both sides of the war, both in what the leaders at the time knew and in the various pressures each was facing in trying to lead nations during a war. This is a Western-based book, and thus ultimately comes down on the side of the deployment of these weapons being "necessary", but Thomas really shows effort to show that at least some of the American leaders that ultimately selected the targets and ordered the strikes did at least attempt to consider other alternatives - but again, given their own intelligence estimates, planning, and pressures, ultimately concluded to issue the orders they did.
One thing that becomes crystal clear when reading this text, however, is that while there may not have been (apparently clearly were not) actual communications regarding this between the governments, there absolutely were people - high ranking people - on both sides that were seeking ways to avoid this fate. There were those on the American side high enough up to know what was being built in top secrecy but low enough to not be able to countermand the order to actually use them that wanted to avoid civilian deaths at *all* costs - even if it meant not dropping these bombs at all. There were those on the Japanese side that were striving, as early as late 1944 in particular, to find some way to end the war and still allow Japan to retain its Imperial system, or at bare minimum its Emperor. (Which, to be clear, despite the US "insisting" on "unconditional" surrender, *was* ultimately allowed - and yes, Thomas goes into detail here too about what the terms actually meant to both sides.)
Truly one of the better histories of the topic I've ever come across, and I'm glad I finally read this text on US Memorial Weekend 2025, as we begin to go through the 80th anniversary of many of the final events detailed in this book.
Very much recommended.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Mass Effect. September 11. Small Exurban Atlanta, Georgia. A Blimp Commonly Seen At Major US Sporting Events. All Connected By One Event. Many, many years ago - nearly as far back as the fire at the heart of this book, though I'm not quite *that* old - I attended a Family Day (or whatever they called it at the time) at the Goodyear plant in Rockmart, Ga, just outside metropolitan Atlanta at the time. My dad and several uncles all worked for Goodyear at one of their two plants in my hometown of Cartersville, just up the road, and for whatever reason this year (and maybe one other?) Goodyear was combining the event for all three plants. Little did I know that in attending that event, I would have a direct - if extremely remote - connection to a fire that killed 13 US Marines and injured nearly 50 other people when my dad was 19 and just before my mom's 19th birthday, nearly a year before they wed and within 5 yrs before my birth. To the level that given my family and community connections, it is at least somewhat likely that I actually know people who know the people who likely never even knew that something they had made had unfortunately indirectly caused so much devastation.
And little did Henry know that in including the tiny detail of who made the fuel bladder that leaked the fuel that burned and caused these casualties, he would instantly make this tale that much more personal to a reviewer who had never heard of this tragedy before seeing this book.
But there are wider connections here, both more in the aftermath than the setup. One issue Henry dives into for a page or two (of just barely 230 pages of actual text here) actually connects directly to an issue explored early in the first Mass Effect game in an encounter that is almost unavoidable, but to reveal which one would be a major spoiler for the discussion at this point of the book, as they are in fact identical, with identical reasonings if not identical particulars.
The other, perhaps even most surprising connection of all, is actually that this 1979 USMC tragedy along the slopes of Mount Fuji in Japan is directly connected to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City - and directly helped save lives in 2001. All because one doc in particular was there in 1979 trying to save the lives of as many of these Marines as he could and learned lessons that became directly applicable that Tuesday in New York.
Read this book to learn of the Marines tragically lost over those two months in late 1979. Their stories have rarely been told outside of Marine circles, and everyone deserves to be remembered and have their stories known. Read this book to learn of the mistakes that were made that caused this calamity - or certainly exacerbated it, at minimum - and what we can do better both in the military (which *has* updated and clarified the relevant regulations over the intervening decades) and as a society in response to emergency and traumatic situations. Read this book to learn of the selflessness and heroism of so many working to save as many people as possible, and of the Marines themselves who were so often so much more worried about their fellow Marine than their own body. Read this book because so few of us have ever heard these stories, yet the sacrifice and courage of so many truly deserve to be more well known by so many more of us.
And yes, after you read this book... leave your own review. Tell the world what you thought of Henry's reporting here (reads like a thriller, even as you know it is all too real) or the events shown here (I think I've been clear on that point). Help get the word out about this book so that the world can see what happened in 1979... and since.
And then go hug a loved one, because as this tale so poignantly points out... you never really know when it will be the last time you have a chance to do so.
Very much recommended.
PS: The star deduction? Unfortunately there was no bibliography at all in the Advance Review Copy edition of the book I read, and while I understand that this is original investigation, even by my more relaxed bibliographic requirements of nonfiction books these last few years I still really need to see at least around 15% of the text be bibliography, as that does seem to be a rough industry standard and is the standard I've been judging nonfiction books by for quite some time.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Mass Effect. September 11. Small Exurban Atlanta, Georgia. A Blimp Commonly Seen At Major US Sporting Events. All Connected By One Event. Many, many years ago - nearly as far back as the fire at the heart of this book, though I'm not quite *that* old - I attended a Family Day (or whatever they called it at the time) at the Goodyear plant in Rockmart, Ga, just outside metropolitan Atlanta at the time. My dad and several uncles all worked for Goodyear at one of their two plants in my hometown of Cartersville, just up the road, and for whatever reason this year (and maybe one other?) Goodyear was combining the event for all three plants. Little did I know that in attending that event, I would have a direct - if extremely remote - connection to a fire that killed 13 US Marines and injured nearly 50 other people when my dad was 19 and just before my mom's 19th birthday, nearly a year before they wed and within 5 yrs before my birth. To the level that given my family and community connections, it is at least somewhat likely that I actually know people who know the people who likely never even knew that something they had made had unfortunately indirectly caused so much devastation.
And little did Henry know that in including the tiny detail of who made the fuel bladder that leaked the fuel that burned and caused these casualties, he would instantly make this tale that much more personal to a reviewer who had never heard of this tragedy before seeing this book.
But there are wider connections here, both more in the aftermath than the setup. One issue Henry dives into for a page or two (of just barely 230 pages of actual text here) actually connects directly to an issue explored early in the first Mass Effect game in an encounter that is almost unavoidable, but to reveal which one would be a major spoiler for the discussion at this point of the book, as they are in fact identical, with identical reasonings if not identical particulars.
The other, perhaps even most surprising connection of all, is actually that this 1979 USMC tragedy along the slopes of Mount Fuji in Japan is directly connected to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City - and directly helped save lives in 2001. All because one doc in particular was there in 1979 trying to save the lives of as many of these Marines as he could and learned lessons that became directly applicable that Tuesday in New York.
Read this book to learn of the Marines tragically lost over those two months in late 1979. Their stories have rarely been told outside of Marine circles, and everyone deserves to be remembered and have their stories known. Read this book to learn of the mistakes that were made that caused this calamity - or certainly exacerbated it, at minimum - and what we can do better both in the military (which *has* updated and clarified the relevant regulations over the intervening decades) and as a society in response to emergency and traumatic situations. Read this book to learn of the selflessness and heroism of so many working to save as many people as possible, and of the Marines themselves who were so often so much more worried about their fellow Marine than their own body. Read this book because so few of us have ever heard these stories, yet the sacrifice and courage of so many truly deserve to be more well known by so many more of us.
And yes, after you read this book... leave your own review. Tell the world what you thought of Henry's reporting here (reads like a thriller, even as you know it is all too real) or the events shown here (I think I've been clear on that point). Help get the word out about this book so that the world can see what happened in 1979... and since.
And then go hug a loved one, because as this tale so poignantly points out... you never really know when it will be the last time you have a chance to do so.
Very much recommended.
PS: The star deduction? Unfortunately there was no bibliography at all in the Advance Review Copy edition of the book I read, and while I understand that this is original investigation, even by my more relaxed bibliographic requirements of nonfiction books these last few years I still really need to see at least around 15% of the text be bibliography, as that does seem to be a rough industry standard and is the standard I've been judging nonfiction books by for quite some time.
Originally posted at bookanon.com.
Added to listBookAnon.com Summer 2025 Reading Listwith 43 books.
