Ash

Wow, I'm clearly in the minority here, but why the heck do people adore this book/series? I honestly don't get it, and I guess I never will. There are tons of great YA fairy-centric stories, so why waste your time on this one?

DNFed at less than 20%... yikes.

DNF @ 250 pages/ 30%


Reading Notes

p.250/30% mini review:

1. Where. Are. The. Dragons.
Seriously, where??? How am I 200+ pages in and dragons have been barely present? Also, dragon names: Fýredel? Cool, epic-sounding. The Nameless One... what? Really? The most evil and murderous dragon is called the Nameless One??? I'm seeing a trend... (He Who Must Not Be Named, the Evil One, etc.) How original.

2. Sabran is so damn annoying. She is actually the worse person in the book. How can someone so vain, selfish, and stupid ever be the queen of a country and figurehead of a major religion is beyond me. Why is most of the focus on this character? Her kingdom is easily the most boring one out of all of them.

3. There's been a minor character death so far that was so underwhelming, I had to read the passage twice just to make sure he was actually dead and not just chilling. I liked this character, but I didn't get to see him enough to develop strong emotions upon his dying (very anticlimactically, btw). He died too soon in the story to have any emotional effect whatsoever, which seems rather pointless.

4. The fact that most of the time we're stuck in the West with Sabran is really disheartening. The East is by far more interesting, but we barely spend any time there. Tané and Niclays have potential as characters, but no, I'm forced to read about snooty Sabran 90% of the time.

5. Am I really going to read 800+ pages of this...? I'm questioning my sanity.

[Edit: No, no I won't. I dropped this book so fast after p. 250. I refuse to keep reading even though, according to some, “it gets better after 50%!!” No, don't care.]

6. If anyone dares compare this to The Lord of the Rings, please give them a stern talking to. LOTR is a masterpiece in every shape and form, and it is definitely unfair to attempt to compare anything else to it, but the fact that Priory of the Orange Tree has been called the “feminist LOTR” is such an insult to the latter. Just.... just don't go there if you don't want your book to be pulled apart and destroyed because of this poor comparison. There is nothing in Priory that remotely resembles LOTR.

I want to love this book. It has everything that I typically like to read: an adventure, fantastical creatures, a historical setting, and yet, I'm on my second try of trying to read it, but I just can't. I lose interest despite the pretty artwork and themes I usually enjoy.

DNF at 20%, for good this time. I don't think I'll try to read it a 3rd time.

This review will look at each story individually.————The Judgment (pp.77-88)★★[read: 12/12/21] This one was definitely strange, even for Kafka. It read as a disjointed dream that left me scratching my head as to it's meaning. The protagonist of the short story, Georg, starts off the narration by writing a letter to his childhood friend who lives in St-Petersburg, Russia (we assume that Georg is somewhere in Germanic Europe). One day, Georg is engaged to be married and decides to write to his friend to let him know. However, before mailing the letter, he talks with his father and ‘warns' him about his intent to inform his friend. This is where the story takes a strange turn: the father, who is old and seems a bit demented, begins to rail on his son and tells him that he doesn't have a friend in Russia, because he, the father, has been secretly communicating with him all these years and pushed him away from Georg. At the very end, Georg's father tells him that he should drown himself, which is exactly what Georg does: he runs out of the house and jumps into the river. Georg's last actions are very nonsensical, and the ‘message' of this story is unclear. The judgment from the title happens in two fold: 1) Georg judges his friend in Russia for his lifestyle and assumes things about him, and 2) Georg's father judges him on his ability to run the family company, to honour his deceased mother, and to take care of his ailing father.The Metamorphosis (pp.89-139)★★★★★[read: 12/12/21]The Metamorphosis is the first Kafka story I ever read, and I have reread it a number of times over the year because it is my absolute favourite of his. Truth be told, I have a bad phobia of cockroaches, and the idea of being transformed into one is beyond terrifying to me. However, this novella is so unique and intriguing, I can't help myself from loving it. Gregor Samsa is an ordinary man who works as a travelling salesman and who wakes up one morning transformed into a giant bug (technically, the type of insect is not specified, but historically we have often associated it to cockroaches because they are disgusting). The whole narrative follows Gregor's train of thoughts as he processes what happened to him and wonders about what will happen to his job, his family, etc. The transformation that takes place is in allegory of how society alienates its individuals. Furthermore, the story comments heavily on family dynamics, with Gregor's austere father and sister being the antitheses to his more liberal self.In The Penal Colony (pp.140-168)★★★★★[read: 09/12/21]I chose to read this short story first out of the collection because of current work I'm doing on law in literature. I'm used to Kafka's nightmarish stories, but this one in particular is very chilling and disturbing. the story features four characters: The Condemned, the Soldier, The Explorer, and the Officer. The Explorer is asked to assist the execution of the Condemned, and is told about the method of execution: a machine, the Harrow, that engraves the literal sentence of the prisoner into his skin until he dies of his wounds (which can take up to 12 hours). The Explorer quickly realizes how inhumane and cruel this method is, especially because there is no chance for the Condemned to defend himself. Much like the witch trials of old, the Condemned is put to death based on hearsay and is denied the right to know what his sentence is (as well as the reason for it). The Officer complains that the New Commandant of the penal colony does his utmost to have this tradition fall out of favour by denying him funds to repair/upkeep the machine, having lowered attendance to the executions, and inviting foreigners like the Explorer to come and witness the executions (and hopefully stand up against the injustice of it). The Officer wishes for the Explorer to be on his side, but the latter refuses. In the end, the machine breaks down when the Officer feeds it the “be just!” verdict and lays himself beneath the apparatus to receive his punishment. The Officer, who cherished and respected the machine, and who believed in this system wholeheartedly, is violently murdered by his own contraption. The allusions here to Dostoevsky's [b:Crime and Punishment 7144 Crime and Punishment Fyodor Dostoevsky https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1382846449l/7144.SY75.jpg 3393917] are clear as day, and the allegorical representation of WWI is embodied in the Officer and the Old Commandant.

Read my full review here: https://vicsense.wordpress.com/2018/01/07/a-thousand-pieces-of-you-firebird-1/

—-

THE COVER IS GORGEOUS.

RUSSIAN PAUL IS GORGEOUS.

THE CHIVALRY AND VALOR IS BLINDING.

I”m all about narratives set in Imperial Russia. Lieutenant Markov is the best; too bad he isn't a main character.