The Lady of the Lake

Part five of “Geralt is again the Witcher”

The intro has a lot of time jumps and involves a few new, secondary characters and the latter feels a bit unnecessary. Toussaint is an interesting change of environment with all the knights and vineyards but Fringilla is so cliche that I find it unbelievable that Geralt with all his experience has fallen for her trap. Fortunately there’s some monster hunting happening, so it’s fine.

There are a couple of pretty important places presented here like it’s not the last book in the series. And overall the amount of descriptions for the same kind of events is a bit weird—in one place it’s just one line and then a scene break, in another it’s a page or two. Most of the descriptions of Ciri's travels just waste time and it feels like even the author knows it because at some point he gives a few short descriptions of different places in a row and then says "there were even more places". And then there’s another one which wastes two pages on some random astronomer who can't say anything to Ciri—because of his shock?—and misses a very rare comet because of her, this is supposed to be funny, I guess. And then Sapkowski spends time to scientifically describe and prove The White Frost. Do we really need that in a fantasy world?

Some side characters from previous books, who haven’t appeared for a long time, return here, sometimes we're even shown their point of view. Like Jarre who has changed a lot and goes through some hard times, his story line is very interesting. And sometimes you have a hard time remembering who that character is because her previous appearance is in Blood of Elves.

Ciri and Vilgefortz interaction is just boring—he talks too much, she can't do anything. However that whole episode is one of the best parts of the book, it’s like the final point of the whole adventure, that’s what all characters have been going towards all this time. And we get a big battle where almost everybody is involved, it’s really nice.

The problem is that it’s only the middle of the book and it feels like the ending of the series, it's very confusing. But it just drags afterwards with a lot of politics and some random, unnecessary side quests. It feels like Sapkowski got tired of writing The Witcher and didn't know what to do with these characters.

The ending is ambiguous. Sex scene in the royal library is too much. The story moves forward just by pure coincidence more than once. The emperor suddenly tells us his life story for a few pages. The elves are just gone from the story after their big setup.

I just hope that Season of Storms is better.

Kinda felt like a drag maybe because I did too many in a short time

Very disappointed in the ending as most fans are. At least we have the games but I'm sad all my favs died (⁠╥⁠﹏⁠╥⁠)

A saga of men and monsters, where we soon find men to be worse than monsters. The Witcher series presents a social criticism of the evil deeds humans can commit. Who knew that the bath scene between Geralt and Yennefer would be the biggest foreshadowing in all of the fantasy world. Also, I consistently asked myself if the “Witcher” that gives name to the series is actually Ciri, and not Geralt.

I also find poetic how the saga portrays parenthood as derived from deeds, and not blood. A sterile mutant (Geralt) and a converted sorceress (Yennefer), both biologically sterile, serve the role of parents to Ciri like their family could never had. Also, the role of Fringilla in this series cannot be overstated.

It's at the end of the series that we finally understand why specifically the Witcher 3 game is called The Wild Hunt.

The version I read was a poor translation, pace of book is more enjoyable compared to the previous volume.
I'm disappointed the origins to Vilgefortz' power are not explained.

I've now had enough of Gerald for a while. I'll read/listen to season of storms when I feel like I miss the characters (or the narrator!), but not yet, as I've recently found out that it's actually a prequel.

2.5
damn i love the characters in witcher - and the mini arcs (the doctors were one of the best part of the book and the only part of the war stuff i cared abt). i also generally like the weird disjointed storytelling that comes together for a larger picture across the books it had a great tempo when the scenes were building

i wish that the main story was given more time cuz it felt rushed despite the 600 page length - prob cuz there was so much extraneous things. also i felt like there was so much weird out of character things like geralt chillin for a few months and just giving up ciri to emhyr. i also am v unhappy with the way ciri “accepts her role” near the end with the lodge it felt like such a weird scene. it made sense i suppose but like man it felt really weird. it also just carries over in general to the way all the antagonists view ciri - like jfc it went from one guy tryna have a kid with her to another to another to another and another and its like incredibly uncomfy and meh to read. it existed across the books but it was so bad in this one.

im sad to see the books end tho i liked them more than their general 3ish star rating - like overall the series gets a 4 even tho the individual books ebbed and flowed

Found it quite confusing 70% of time. There were so many time and storyline jumps that the battle between Nilfgard and nordlings was almost incomprehensible. The end wasn't as rewarding as I would have expected, it feels like the main characters got weaker at the end. Even though Ciri's time and space jumps were confusing I enjoyed them. Plot twist with Ciri's parentage was also pretty awesome. I loved the whole series, but would like a stronger end to the saga.??

Such a complex narrative. I am still amazed by the richness of Sapkowski's world building. We got to see more of these characters and the deep feeling that drives them. There's so much hope in it but also so much loss - it really is a roller coaster. I can't imagine where the story goes from here.

This one left me wrung out. I'm glad it had a semi happy ending. Although the riot at the end was brutal.

spoilers!!

Is it just me, or was everything that ever happened and every bit of character development that occurred over the last 4 books totally and completely for nothing? I am thoroughly underwhelmed by how this series ended.

Geralt, our bad-ass, sarcastic, and determined Witcher? Yeah, makes sense that he will actually be one of the blandest characters and will proceed to ultimately “die” in the lamest, most un-heroic way possible and settle for domesticity. Yennefer, again, another bad-ass, determined character, contributes nothing interesting but being able to throw shields up during fights and then just kind of sucks at other attempts at magic. Ciri, the character in which the last 4 books have built up to be someone powerful and important? She escapes her many foes trying to use and abuse her, only to never regain any sort of power or do anything important for the world. She only manages some heroics at the end with Geralt and Yen because of her dumb unicorn, and then she just kind of blips out to also settle for domesticity? So out of character, so anticlimactic.

And why God, why, did I have to follow any part of Jarre or Iola's story? So boring and it was time that could have been spent on our main characters so their storyline didn't suck.

I'm not sure I can even express the disappointment of how Geralt's party all die in unbelievably lame ways. Or how I'm supposed to believe Emehr, after tearing the world apart in war to find Ciri, just gives her up because he saw that she was sad??

Otherwise, there was some decent writing and plenty of scenes that were fun to read. This was on it's way to being my favorite fantasy series. I absolutely love the world and characters. I look forward to the Netflix show hopefully salvaging the wreckage of this final book. In the mean time, I will continue to play the Witcher 3 and pretend that it is canon, hopefully erasing the unfortunate storyline of this final book.

2.5 stars.

This review is also featured on Behind the Pages: Lady of the Lake

Ciri has traveled to an elven world. One that appears to be a place of tranquility, but hides a terrible history. Time does not exist in this world and Ciri must escape. For the elves want something from Ciri, something she is not willing to give them. And with each denial, their darker sides begin to show. Meanwhile, Geralt has never stopped searching for Ciri. Even if it kills him he will pursue the girl and try to bring her to safety. Destiny has much in store for the characters of the Witcher.

Ciri's character development had me worried at the start of this novel. The tough take no-nonsense witcher girl began to backslide. She never seemed to use her experience and skills to think of ways to escape. As the story progressed, I started to see the Ciri I knew she was, and yet many of her choices confused me. The number of times she tried to give her body away instead of fighting or attempting infiltration was shocking. It also left me feeling a bit disgusted that this theme of giving yourself away was used. I did have to stop reading this book about halfway through and branch off to other novels because I was so frustrated. If this weren't the last in the series I would have most likely DNFed this book.

I will say though that Andrzej Sapkowski is thorough when creating villains. As each adversary appeared, both old and new, their wickedness was written into every part of their character. From their ideologies to their despicable thoughts and actions, it was clear how malicious their intent was. And not every villain was the sword-wielding, action prone type. Some hid in the shadows and manipulated behind the scenes, or used their misguided wants and needs to redirect the protagonists. However, I wish more time had been spent with the protagonists versus the antagonists.

When the protagonists were on the page their parts were fast-paced and engaging. However, the majority of this tale returns to politics and backdoor deals. There was also an emphasis on building up minor characters readers met in previous books and giving them a completed character arc. But when it came time to end the character arcs of the protagonists, and even some of the secondary characters close to the main storyline, their endings were cut short and some even glossed over. After such an epic journey throughout this series, I expected more out of the last book.

Does Lady of the Lake tie up the Witcher series? Yes, it does bring everything to an end, whether well developed or not, and it gives readers information that has never before been revealed. Certain pieces click into place and you'll find yourself thinking back over the previous books and rethinking certain scenes or characters. I just wish our heroes had been given more page time and certain areas of the writing style allowed for a more detailed plot for everyone.

This was painfully long. Some bits were getting really boring. Definitely the weakest of all Witcher books I've read.

Very pleasant to read but (even) more sad than previous ones :)
I am not so sure why I give “only” 4 starts, I guess is because of the long start of it, I didn't like that much the first 1/4 - 1/3 of it

This may be a long review, because I have a lot of feelings about this book, and this series as a whole. I won't go too far into the plot because this is the last book of the series, and I don't want to spoil anything.

This series as a whole has been a mixed bag for me. I really enjoyed the short stories. Then, when we got into the full books, they were hit or miss. There were some books that I thought were really captivating, and some that were complete wastes of time to read. This one falls in the middle of that spectrum. First, there were so many potential triggers in this book. There were multiple sexual assault scenes that got graphic. Every time, I was completely pulled out of the story and disgusted. They didn't add to the plot at all. In my opinion, the detracted from it greatly. They were unnecessary.

However, there were certain parts of the book that I felt were so great. The plot was fast paced, and the characters were put in interesting situations. Then, all of a sudden, a chapter would be thrown in that completely killed the pace and was incredibly boring. Every chapter had a different “vibe” to it that could be quite jarring.

Overall, I love the story of the Geralt and Ciri and Yennefer and all of their friends. I think a lot of that stems from my love of the game, however. I don't know if these books are worth it to read. I don't think that the good parts are good enough to outweigh how much shit you have to get through to get to them. I am very excited to continue watching the show and seeing how they adapt it, and hopefully improve it.

TW (there's so many): ableism, alcohol, amputation, animal abuse, animal death, assault, attempted rape, blood, bones, child abuse, death, drugs, famine, fire, genocide, gore, hospitalization, incest, kidnapping, misogyny, murder, pedophilia, physical abuse, rape, sexually explicit scenes, skeletons, torture, violence, war, forced artificial insemination

It's disappointing to see cahir and milva characters build through out the saga only for them to killed for no reason whatsoever.



brb just gonna cry in my room

So I think this top portion will be the basis for my review for all five of the Witcher series (excluding The Last Wish and Sword of Destiny–Kind of, you'll see...)

I feel like it took me a long time to read these, when in actuality, I started the first one in January so that isn't really all that long. Some of the way I'm feeling may be based off a lapse in memory though because I read around 95 books around the reading of these so I may be hazy.

For starters, I think Andrzej Sapkowski is a phenomenal writer. Secondly, I think David French did an absolutely wonderful job translating these to English. And thirdly, I think the Gollancz paperbacks were amazing–great cover art, nice quality–I actually managed to read them all without breaking the spines.

Sapkowski has such a way about his writing that the dialogue in the novels can be truly captivating. He wields it so well that he has honestly created such a wonderful lush lore within his world that really carried the hundreds of pages he wrote. I think that overall, this attention to detail within every word uttered may actually have been in some ways at a detriment to his overarching story.

So to speak, his great characters, the companions of the Witcher, and even the enemies, all have this way of leaving you wanting more. However, if you were to pull away all of that and the world's lore, the series itself is kind of about... nothing. I did find myself more than once getting to the end of one of the novels and being like wait... nothing happened? Destiny has brought the Witcher and Ciri together, and yet they are also destined to never be together... it's just the kind of realization that stings. If you read the first book you can skip to the final book for the ending because the others are just more of the same. Luckily for me, as I've already stated, I enjoyed the dialogue and the world building, I drank that sh*t up. It's just kind of weird/funny to realize negative things like that about something you've rated pretty well. Despite all of that, I really enjoyed them.

In terms of The Lady of the Lake especially, I find that in each novel he kind of played with different ways of storytelling and this one starting with the knight of Arthur finding her really threw me off. It also then didn't resolve itself for 500 pages. I think at one point I thought it was a ploy and that he was actually one of the elves in the other world? I don't know, but it was kind of weird. In general, that whole world hopping bit was a little dragged out for me.
Alternatively, in terms of this being the ultimate finale, I loved the level of gore and action. I thought the Battle of Brenna was outstanding writing. The jumping between the battle and the future with survivors of the battle writing about it really worked for me.
I will say though another negative for me was the deaths at Stygga Castle. I know the bad luck surrounding the Witcher and those that follow him, but this kind of heartless, unforgiving killing off of main characters didn't exactly work for me. It's not like reading A Song of Fire and Ice where it's expected, therefore the lack of emotion I felt around them dying was a little lackluster. Also, I mean come on, we get all the way to the end and everyone dies EXCEPT Geralt, Ciri, and Yennefer? In that sense it seemed a little cheesy.
A giant positive for me was that I did not see the twist of Duny being the emperor at all. I don't know if I was supposed to (?) but WOW. Ciri's dad the whole time? WOW incest is so absolutely gross. Glad it didn't go there...

I did like the kind of hazy ending myself. Did Yenn and Geralt die? Did they live? No! They got married and several other people we know are dead were said to be in attendance!
I know what the game series wants us to believe.

I would give thus 3.7 stars if I could but of course that is not an option on good reads so rounded up to 5 stars.

I liked this one more than tower of swallows for sure. Paticularily Ciri's story line and her jumping through time and worlds which for me was a really awesome aspect of the story.

Andrzej sapowski is good and creating characters you care about for our primary characters anyway. Ciri, Yennifer and Geralt. Secondary characters such as Dandelion, Vilgefortz, Triss etc... I found were people That just were not that interesting as characters. They were not bad characters I am just nuetral on them.

This book could have dropped the entire last chapter and I dont feel it would have made much of a difference to the overall story arc of the book. Just having Ciri, Yennifer, and Geralt be re-united in the end without all the extra stuff would have been more than enough for me.

Overall however a good read and the witcher book series as a whole is pritty decent. Good story. The writing style is ok.

It really could end no other way. I gotta say, a lot of the reviews of this book made it sound like it was rife with problems, or that it mistreated characters or their motivations.

I don't see that at all. In fact, Sapkowski has been experimenting with form and narrative throughout the series and finally executed his vision with a deft hand. Some of his books suffer from strange time jumps, moving to new narrators or a new narrative style. This one did a lot of that but it kept its momentum.

He absolutely did right by his characters and found a way to weave the concepts he toyed with throughout without taking a cheap way out.

A fulfilling conclusion that made me cry several times.

Incredibly exciting action and politicking, though bits of it felt unnecessary (Boreas Mun chapter). I like the ambiguity of the ending, but it was achieved in kind of a strange way. I wish the narrative style had stayed consistent throughout the series. Nimue and Condwiramurs are interesting storytellers and it would have been nice for them to be involved from the beginning.

Wow, brutal. but then, brutal has been a keyword of the entire series. In some ways, I kind of find it refreshing.

Grimdark fantasy before grimdark came to mean cool assassins and women dressed in skin tight leather with tattoos. Basically before it became superficial. There is nothing superficial here.

I'm so glad I decided to reread this. I love the characters and their relationships. My only problem is I find that the sections that AREN'T focused on Geralt, Ciri, Yennefer (or any of the other main characters really) somewhat meandering. The series can sometimes get bogged down in politics, and not particularly interesting ones. I'm also one of the only ones amongst my friends who have read this series that finds the ending satisfying