Red Shift

I first read this book as a teenager and found it haunting and moving. I come to reread it 30 odd years later and still find it a powerful book. Alan Garner is one of our finest writers and here he concocts a story made up of three interlinking strands. All feature a troubled boy protagonist and a 5000 year old stone axe. The present day story features two teenage lovers, Jan and Tom. Tom lives with his parents in a caravan, fighting his inner demons while trying to cope with his feelings for Jan. Another story features Roman legionnaires, survivors of the massacred Ninth legion who seek sanctuary on Mow Cop hill. The final strand is set in the Civil War and tells of the massacre at Barthomley, near Mow Cop.

Mow Cop, it's castle and folly tower, it's church and the surrounding landscape all loom large in the story. The three protagonists are linked by visions all seemingly connected to the stone axe.

Garner roots his tales in the landscape and Red Shift is no exception. It's a short novel, less than 200 pages long. But he packs a powerful emotional punch into those pages, as the tragedy and mystery unfold in each strand. There are no easy resolutions here and the book is all the more affecting for that.

A fine read.

This book is designated “young adult,” but it's a challenging read. The writing is spare. Action is mostly communicated by dialogue without attribution and there's little description and no explanation of what is going on. Yet, although the writing is spare, there is a lot going on. The story takes place in three time periods in the same geographical area. The three storylines have some things in common, including an ancient axe head, a man who is troubled by disturbing visions and a woman who attempts to protect and love him. In each time period the people are experiencing terrible violence of different kinds. The three threads are brought together at the end of the book in a way that's unexpected and powerful, but also raises questions. I recommend this if you like to mull over your books for days after reading the last page!

3 stars, Metaphorosis reviews

Summary
At three different times, young men struggle to understand the world and make themselves understood in the vicinity of Mow Cop hill, tied together by an ancient stone votive axe.

Review
Alan Garner's books were important to my childhood, from The Weirdstone of Brisingamen (we even had it on tape) to The Owl Service (which was definitely more adult than I was when I read it). I was excited to run across a book of his I'd never heard of (and one with a science fiction-oriented title). That fond familiarity is doing a lot of work in bringing this book the rating I give. And, for that matter, in getting me to finish it at all. In the end, I rated partly for intent rather than accomplishment.

Garner is best known for children's books. Red Shift is a shift to an older set of characters. It's never quite clear how old they are, but old enough to have sex, at any rate. There's nothing wrong with that, but it did take me a moment to readjust my expectations.

With that shift, Garner seems to have decided to take the opportunity to experiment. Some of the narrative shortcuts he's relied on in other books (such as elided but implicit dialogue) are taken to extremes here. To be blunt, I found it difficult to be sure what was happening at almost every point in the book. Had the author not been Alan Garner, I doubt I'd have made it past the first 20 pages. As it is, I persevered, but I'm not sure it was worth the effort. In plain terms, the book is a mess.

Tom, the protagonist of the most modern and accessible section, and both of his past analogs, appears to have some form of neurodivergence, though it's never clear quite what. All three of the analogs, find it difficult to express themselves – at times childish or vague, at times highly sophisticated and knowledgeable. Each is loved and supported by a woman, though it's frankly never clear what they see in him.

It's not just the overall plot trajectory that's muddled; that part is actually possible to follow. But the personal interactions – which are the core of the story – are maddeningly vague, exacerbated by dialogue that seldom gives much indication of what the context is, or even who is speaking.

I expected to like this, and very much wanted to, but in the end, I couldn't. It's too stylized, too inferential, and just too hard to make sense of.