I do not understand WHY Baldacci needed to copy Jack Reacher 2. I find his historical take very limited - the only thing we learn from the late 1940's is that there has been a war and that women are only good for sex and other services 3. Very comical was his clipped writing style. I listened to an audiobook, but even then - the sentences were very short and packed with action. Like Lee Child's. But rather comically so. I felt like I was listening to bad old movie dialogues- full of clichés and repetitions. 4. How many times does a reader need to get told that Archer fought in a war? 5. What, he fought in a war?
The plot was OK. Better than I expected. All in all I won't read the next sequel.