Ratings3
Average rating4.3
An illustrated tour of the structures and patterns we call "math" The only numbers in this book are the page numbers. Math Without Numbers is a vivid, conversational, and wholly original guide to the three main branches of abstract math—topology, analysis, and algebra—which turn out to be surprisingly easy to grasp. This book upends the conventional approach to math, inviting you to think creatively about shape and dimension, the infinite and infinitesimal, symmetries, proofs, and how these concepts all fit together. What awaits readers is a freewheeling tour of the inimitable joys and unsolved mysteries of this curiously powerful subject. Like the classic math allegory Flatland, first published over a century ago, or Douglas Hofstadter's Godel, Escher, Bach forty years ago, there has never been a math book quite like Math Without Numbers. So many popularizations of math have dwelt on numbers like pi or zero or infinity. This book goes well beyond to questions such as: How many shapes are there? Is anything bigger than infinity? And is math even true? Milo Beckman shows why math is mostly just pattern recognition and how it keeps on surprising us with unexpected, useful connections to the real world. The ambitions of this book take a special kind of author. An inventive, original thinker pursuing his calling with jubilant passion. A prodigy. Milo Beckman completed the graduate-level course sequence in mathematics at age sixteen, when he was a sophomore at Harvard; while writing this book, he was studying the philosophical foundations of physics at Columbia under Brian Greene, among others.
Reviews with the most likes.
Imagine stumbling upon a book that turns the daunting world of abstract mathematics into a playground of ideas. This book is exactly that—a fun journey through complex concepts, presented in such a light and engaging manner that you won't even realize you're learning. he author explains complex ideas in a way that's simple to grasp, so you don't have to work too hard to get it. But sometimes, I feel the explanations are a bit too basic. They could go a little deeper into the topics while still keeping things clear and straightforward.
It's not the book, it's me. I made it all the way to chapter three, where the author was with the patience of a saint and very small words, trying to help people like me understand the concept of shapes, and I realized every additional thing I learned was making it worse. Loved the illustrations and the challenge to the way we typically view mathematics, but probably not for people with profound dyscalculia.