Kunsten at lytte til andre – Sådan får du bedre relationer gennem bedre samtaler

While reading this book I put some of her advice into practice and noticed immediately the results looked a lot like she said they would.

She also writes very concisely and paces the book so that it keeps your attention and tells you the info you are there for but doesn't linger on unnecessary bits.

One note: there was one paragraph talking about the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, and she used it to back up a claim she was making. While it is argued in general that there are some parts of the hypothesis that can be seen as possibly correct, the SW Hypothesis has been proven false and using it as support to an argument made me pause for a sec and wonder about other research mentioned. Maybe she knows about the false proof of the hypothesis and was merely using it to demonstrate a point? I want to give her the benefit of the doubt, the rest of the book was so great.