Ratings158
Average rating3.8
Although many people I have talked to about this book regard it as being boring (as it is a monologue), I believe it's a great book for that very reason. I loved it!
Exceeded my expectations completely. I didn't know what to really expect, but being my favorite author, I knew it would at least be good. This was a rollercoaster of emotion. A lot of tough subject matter, as to be expected from King. The whole story really comes together and is so hard to put down. About as close to five stars as you can come. 9/10
When he tries King can write compelling female characters facing difficulties. Dolores is a woman that people see as hard, but inside she is complex. I really liked the experience of reading this book. Dolores is the only one talking even when she is answering questions. We don’t hear from the people asking the questions. We just hear her. I like that there weren’t any chapters and that it was written in dialect. That really helped me feel like I was sitting at the table hearing her tell the story. There are trigger warnings for abuse and discussion of sexual assault. I stopped reading the book for a while because I wasn’t sure if I wanted to continue, but I picked it back up and was pleased that there were no sexual assault scenes on page. It was discussed, but not portrayed. I appreciated that.
Overall this was better than I expected. I really came to appreciate Dolores and Vera. They had difficult decisions and difficult consequences, but they tried to do the best they could with things as they were at the time.
I loved every minute of this book. it's definitely one of my favorites Stephen King books!!
If you would like to see more of my reviews, please check out my website www.beforewegoblog.com
I think at one point or another, we are all the titular character,
Dolores, in Stephen King's Dolores Claiborne. We may not be her specifically in all ways. But I guarantee that the humanity that Mrs. Claiborne has, the trueness and rawness, will happen at one point or another in every human's life. This, in itself, is what makes Dolores such a relatable character.
“Sometimes you have to be a high riding bitch to survive, sometimes, being a bitch is all a woman has to hang on to.”
― Stephen King, Dolores Claiborne
If you are new to Stephen King and haven't heard about him, which would be crazy because who hasn't heard of King, Dolores Claiborne is Stephen King's first novel entirely told in dialect from a single person point of view. I don't know many authors who could pull off the feat of writing something clear, concise and engaging like Dolores Claiborne while handicapping themselves with this type of narrative style.
But he does it, and he does it well.
Dolores Claiborne is told in one long and breathless story recounted at a police station after Dolores Claiborne has been brought in for questioning for the death of her senile and long time employer Mrs. Vera Donovan. Mrs. Donovan had taken a tumble down the stairs and subsequently perished from the fall. Dolores is under scrutiny by the police because thirty years prior, there were mysterious circumstances around the death of Dolores's husband, Joe. Dolores, herself, is described as an aged, hard-worn woman in her sixties working as a housekeeper in the fictional island of Little Tall Island, Maine. Many of Stephen King's novels take place in Maine, and some ways interconnect with each other. As an aside, if you pay attention to some of the character references in reading Dolores Claiborne, you will notice a direct connection to Gerald's Game. One of King's other horror works.
“What did you ask, Andy Bissette? Do I ‘understand these rights as you've explained em to me'? Gorry! What makes some men so numb? eNo you never mind—still your jawin and listen to me for en awhile. I got an idear you're gonna be listenin to me most of the night, so you might as well get used to it. Coss I understand what you read to me! Do I look like I lost all m'brains since I seen you down to the market? I told you your wife would give you merry hell about buying that day-old bread—penny wise and pound foolish, the old saying is—and I bet I was right, wasn't I?”
― Stephen King, Dolores Claiborne
It turns out that Dolores did not murder Vera. This isn't a spoiler, we find this out in the first twenty pages or so. We also find out that Dolores did murder Joe, the whole town knows it, although they could never prove it. Dolores Claiborne, the story is really “the why.” Why would a woman murder her husband?
Dolores begins her tale, describing it in great detail to Andy and a stenographer, how she came to be married to Joe. How she came to work for Vera and how those two things shape who she became and the choices she took to get there. What you get is the in-depth look is a woman who will do anything to protect her family, and do what is right by her code of ethics. It is morally gray, but life is morally gray, and that lends a sense of realism to Dolores. I can imagine her existing somewhere in the world.
As soon as you get one paragraph into Dolores Claiborne, you will notice King's use of dialect. I am of two minds of this. On the one hand, the jargon can be immersive; it can help the reader immerse themselves in a story. On the other, it can be frustrating and classist. Some author's use dialects to divide rich folk from poor folk. If a character is poor, they speak unintelligibly, dropping letters, forgetting words, and using an excessive amount of slang in their vocabulary. It is lazy and insulting writing. However, I think dialect done well, as I believe King's version here did not make the story difficult to read for me. It isn't Riddley Walker and indecipherable. But it does add to Dolores's character.
“One way or another, all the bridges between that time n this one have been burned. Time's a reach, too, you know, just like the one that lies between the islands and the mainland, but the only ferry that can cross it is memory, and that's like a ghost-ship - if you want it to disappear, after awhile it will.”
― Stephen King, Dolores Claiborne
Stylistically, Dolores Claiborne is not King's typical style. In most of King's novels, even his short stories where brevity is a must, King over explains, over describes, overanalyzes, just overdoes it. If King were to describe a doorknob to the reader, it might be a single paragraph describing the texture, smell, sound, year make and model of said knob. I know that many readers find that level of explanation tedious. It goes right in the face of the minimalist school of writing that is getting more and more mainstream. Others who know King and are familiar with his style, love it. I love it. Although when I read the unabridged version of The Stand that came in at 1327 pages, it might have pushed it a little bit for me. I bring this up because his typical style is in sharp contrast with how Dolores Claiborne is written. This is sharp and concise writing. Almost blunt in its emotional brutality scene to scene. Dolores is not a long-winded character. She speaks her mind, and if there is nothing to say silence is better. I think King took that to heart when writing her, although I don't know many people that can tell a single story, especially to a police officer that is over 300 pages long.
The glory of this story is the relationships that Dolores has, namely the relationship between her boss Vera and her husband, Joe. Joe is almost a caricature of an abusive alcoholic husband. However, it is Dolores's handling of Joe and the language King uses to get across to the reader about Dolores's strength that I found very appealing. Vera and Dolores are another matter entirely. Vera is a bitch. She is a bitch in every sense of the word, Entitled, rich, classist, snobbish. Where King could have used a caricature of a stuffy, white, rich woman, Vera has pain. She isn't all bad, although her moments of where the reader can see through the mist of her money and airs are few and far between. Her relationship between Vera and Dolores is old. It reminds me of the relationships old nemeses have when underneath it all there is an undercurrent of respect and made a sprinkling of love. But you have to dig way, way down to find it.
“...two bitches livin on a little chunk of rock...”
― Stephen King, Dolores Claiborne
If anything, Dolores Claiborne highlights that King is not a one-trick pony. Although he has the horror genre down, he is a talented writer that can write with nuance and gravitas. He writes with heart and emotion. When I hear about King naysayers who talk about his writing being hackneyed, pigeonholed in horror, I think of the story The Body (made into the movie Stand By Me), or Rita Hayworth and The Shawshank Redemption (made into the movie The Shawshank Redemption), and now I think of Dolores Claiborne.
Wow! This is the first novel I've ever read without chapters. I loved this story and Dolores. I've seen the movie and this book is so much better.
un SK atipic, nefiind nici horror, nici cu elemente supranaturale.
Nu e horror, dar este despre oroare - grozăvenia de a fi sărac și lipsit de șanse, iar dacă asta pare rău, există ceva și mai rău: să fii sărac, lipsit de șanse și femeie. La îndemâna agresiunii de diverse feluri a celui care-ar fi trebuit să-ți fie apărător, dar găsește în alcool cheia spre abisurile sufletului omenesc. Oroarea de a trebui să-ți găsești în suflet propriile tenebre pentru a-l opri - și apoi a plăti prețul.
Excelent, mai ales că este un monolog de la un capăt la celălalt (îmi place acest stil narativ) și totuși te conduce prin două povești diferite, prin mai multe minți și prin ani de zile de relații, păstrând și niște revelații neașteptate pentru sfârșit (pe lângă cea evidentă).
Du Stephen King classique, lu quand j'étais adolescent. Ce n'est plus forcément le genre de romans que je lis désormais, mais j'ai eu ma période Stephan King quand j'étais plus jeune.
Stephen King is definitely my favourite author. I am always blown away by his creativity and his ability to always re-invent himself. Even though he is best known for his horror stories, he does write outside that genre and very well indeed, in my opinion.
That doesn't mean I didn't have any issues with this book. As with Scarlet, the way the main character Dolores spoke made it very hard to get into the story. Unlike Scarlet, Dolores' speech was consistent and it did seem genuine.
My other problem was the focus of the story. Dolores promised to talk about a murder but instead, rambled on describing Vera's life and personality. Mind you, it was very interesting but I was looking forward to read about Dolores' life and not Vera's. Once the narrative started to focus more on Dolores, I was completely hooked.
This book was suggested on the back of my copy of Rose Madder and I'm glad I picked it up. My main issue with Rose Madder was that the wonderful and very engaging premise was spoiled by the supernatural aspect. There was no supernatural aspect in this book, which made me enjoy this one a lot more than Rose Madder.