Gwyndolyn
Unfortunately the Jungian analysis requires a level of buy-in that i just don't think is justified. it's an interesting breakdown of feminine cultural signifiers but like a lot of Jung it extrapolates socially constructed traits into metaphysical universal truths with little proof or reasoning beyond assertion. Not really worth the time alas
Unfortunately the Jungian analysis requires a level of buy-in that i just don't think is justified. it's an interesting breakdown of feminine cultural signifiers but like a lot of Jung it extrapolates socially constructed traits into metaphysical universal truths with little proof or reasoning beyond assertion. Not really worth the time alas
Unfortunately the Jungian analysis requires a level of buy-in that i just don't think is justified. it's an interesting breakdown of feminine cultural signifiers but like a lot of Jung it extrapolates socially constructed traits into metaphysical universal truths with little proof or reasoning beyond assertion. Not really worth the time alas
Unfortunately the Jungian analysis requires a level of buy-in that i just don't think is justified. it's an interesting breakdown of feminine cultural signifiers but like a lot of Jung it extrapolates socially constructed traits into metaphysical universal truths with little proof or reasoning beyond assertion. Not really worth the time alas
Many wonderful story elements which stick with and linger in your mind. I think there's a bit of tendency to only read the first set of stories and skip the back half of the book, since they don't directly relate to the titular fiction. But they weave thematic threads and vague connections which work very well together.
Many wonderful story elements which stick with and linger in your mind. I think there's a bit of tendency to only read the first set of stories and skip the back half of the book, since they don't directly relate to the titular fiction. But they weave thematic threads and vague connections which work very well together.
