while i could've done without a lot of the repetition and some of the odd syntax, i do NOT understand why the end is so disliked........it's realistic! not every ghost story has to end the same way (i.e. in some big supernatural showdown with the heroes winning 100% or in them losing completely)! sometimes they can just End and that's okay!
i am however fondly wishing the heteros well for once
certainly an interesting lens on the titular crime (woman looking back on her reminiscences as a child) but the fact remains that there's...very little that actually goes on and not much at all about the crime aside from it happening and some discussion of the procedure. sometimes that can work but in this case i don't think it did entirely; there's also absolutely no resolution but that in my opinion doesn't hurt it because these cases sometimes don't HAVE a resolution, sad as it is
(also i couldn't stand the audiobook after hearing the narrator lick her lips and swallow like every .5 seconds. as someone with misophonia, no thank you)
more like 3.75 stars, but only because i wish that there was more information to some entries
a book about spooky stuff in my state written by a history buff?? be still my heart! i'm so used to illinois ghost books having so much erroneous information and hauntings only based on ~vibes~ so this was a lovely read
feels a bit weird to rate a cookbook so i'm...not going to do that
instead i will say that this was a goddamn delight to read and the photos at the end are simultaneously horrifying (mentally i was running some james lileks-style narration) and adorable (the cucumber crocodile!! precious!!)
reread: feel like pure shit just want vincent price back x