Simply, a first-class thriller.

Less simply, an unpleasantly accurate portrayal of the Troubles in the mid '70s.

April 2, 2018

A noir novella, which I really enjoyed.

November 26, 2016

An ok thriller ruined by the entirely unnecessary sex scenes and the general sexual objectification of the female characters.

August 6, 2023

An interesting start promised much but then fails to deliver and eventually becomes a complete disappointment. The structure of the book also adds to a piecemeal feeling.

December 17, 2015

This is the third time, I think, that I have read this book and the first time I have really enjoyed it. In my younger years, I found it too “talky” and lacking in action. I have, clearly, changed in my taste/appreciation.

September 27, 2017

I enjoyed this early 1960s police procedural.

Unfortunately, my ebook copy was very poorly formatted.

May 9, 2018

I enjoy his writing, but I was not as carried away by this as I was by Pavel & I. Something about the story just felt overly contrived.

November 9, 2016

Perhaps reading this without reading any of the earlier works in the series did not help, but I found the characters flat, uninteresting and, at times, completely incredible. The story possessed similar qualities to the characters.

June 7, 2017

A decent read but too long.

May 12, 2016
April 17, 2018

Lightweight but fun.

December 30, 2018

A top end 3. I enjoyed this the most in the trilogy, with there seeming to be a better fit of the battle history and the crime “mystery”.

View

I thoroughly enjoyed this. Easy to read, yet informative.

January 17, 2018

I liked the creativity of the ideas in this book. The world building was great. It was a little overlong. For me, its greatest crime is that it ends without an ending.

August 3, 2019

I enjoyed the book, even though it felt a little rushed and shallow.

September 18, 2018

I enjoyed this early 1960s police procedural.

Unfortunately, my ebook copy was very poorly formatted.

May 9, 2018

This is so close to a 5 for me. Precision writing with humanity at its core.

October 22, 2019

Perhaps it was the translation, perhaps the original writing style but I did not enjoy this particularly.

August 15, 2018
July 28, 2019

Did not finish. Not funny. Not even mildly amusing. Making “Dawkins” such an extreme, unbelievable caricature is not inherently funny. The book is devoid of any other idea.

June 22, 2016

This is really a 1 but I guess it is my fault, I should have learnt my lesson from reading “One of Us”.

His writing is just not for me and it was a chore to finish this book.

September 26, 2016

This is the third time, I think, that I have read this book and the first time I have really enjoyed it. In my younger years, I found it too “talky” and lacking in action. I have, clearly, changed in my taste/appreciation.

September 27, 2017

The mixing of historical fact and fiction surrounding the death of Edward VI and the short reign of Lady Jane Grey was fine, but the character of Brendan Prescott and his actions were a little bit too over-wrought. The tale of his parentage was cliched.

September 15, 2020

Probably around 3.25.

As the last Wallander, I really wanted to love this book but I can't.

The combination of an underwhelming tale of espionage and a wish to bring Wallander's life to a conclusion did not really work for me.

January 22, 2018