It had some good stuff, including some I didn't know (like recipes for triticale), but also some stuff I don't foresee ever needing (like recipes for triticale).

August 24, 2008
September 3, 2010
September 23, 2009

I laughed. I cried. I liked it.

May 18, 2009

2 1/2 stars, due to bad language & graphic scenes.

September 30, 2009

Simple YA romance, but I liked it

It was easy to predict but well-executed and fun to read. I was a bit surprised none of the therapy so central to her life made it in, even as a calendar entry.

August 3, 2019

I would have given it 4 stars if it had been more PG-rated.

August 28, 2009
February 9, 2019

2.5 stars.

July 31, 2022

The writing was decent, and the motivations were much better than some dystopian sci fi I've read (especially the villain motivations), but somehow, it just didn't grab me.

December 31, 2020

Basic principles of concentrating on what you do best.

February 1, 2006

I read this as a child, and thanks to wonderful librarians who figured out which book it was with very little information, reread it as an adult.

January 1, 1986

It was perhaps surprisingly good. The characters were enthralling, the vocabulary plausible, the mystery a good hook (but not much more), and the religion vitally integrated. 3 1/2 stars.

June 18, 2009

Good coverage of a variety of writing/publishing topics, with a good attitude.

October 10, 2018

Technically well-written, but the story lacked spark. The characters fell in love for shallow reasons and the conflict was weakly convenient. 2.5 stars.

May 9, 2019

How to make accurate snap decisions... and when not to trust them.

August 14, 2008
October 9, 2018
June 18, 2022

2.5 stars. Nothing was BAD, but nothing was great, either. Every problem was solved too easily, and the romance was too insta for me.

June 20, 2022

A nice synthesis of Blink and its opposite, Think. Rather just arguing about which type of thinking is better, it discusses under which circumstances one type of thinking is better than another, and why and how. And then it does it all over again for other types of thinking.

April 15, 2009

While hinting at classic fairy tales, it remains its own story. I like the characters & the writing, but I'm sure I've read a veeery similar queen-fainting-&-reason-why scene somewhere else.....

July 14, 2009

Finally, a Cartland heroine who has some gumption, but she still can't speak in one breath longer than half the book! And what is wrong with having a hero who HASN'T slept with all ladies he's met?

October 29, 2013

I liked the story, but it could have used some noticeable editing for objectionable content.

July 6, 2010