S: Is it not so that Plato's Republic is the foundational text of western philosophy?
J: Of course it is, Socrates.
S: And while many parts may no longer be directly applicable, does not its impact alone make it a relevant read?
J: It certainly does.
S: Is it not that, although many of Plato's ideas will seem alien to a modern reader, this also gives the book value as a point of reflection?
J: I don't understand what you mean, Socrates.
S: Let me put it like this. Is it not still relevant to ask question like: What are the issues with class based systems? Why is free speech important? Is it right to have families as foundational parts of our society? Does this not contradict our idea that merit should determine your life outcomes? What defines a just and legitimate state?
J: These are clearly important thoughts.
S: Then shouldn't everyone with an interest in philosophy, political theory or history read the Republic?
J: Yes, Socrates. Of course, Socrates. I couldn't have put it any better, Socrates.
S: Is it not so that Plato's Republic is the foundational text of western philosophy?
J: Of course it is, Socrates.
S: And while many parts may no longer be directly applicable, does not its impact alone make it a relevant read?
J: It certainly does.
S: Is it not that, although many of Plato's ideas will seem alien to a modern reader, this also gives the book value as a point of reflection?
J: I don't understand what you mean, Socrates.
S: Let me put it like this. Is it not still relevant to ask question like: What are the issues with class based systems? Why is free speech important? Is it right to have families as foundational parts of our society? Does this not contradict our idea that merit should determine your life outcomes? What defines a just and legitimate state?
J: These are clearly important thoughts.
S: Then shouldn't everyone with an interest in philosophy, political theory or history read the Republic?
J: Yes, Socrates. Of course, Socrates. I couldn't have put it any better, Socrates.
One of the great works of polotical philosophy of the 20th century. An important perspective on the delineations between power and violence and the differences between legitimate state action and authocratic behavior.
One of the great works of polotical philosophy of the 20th century. An important perspective on the delineations between power and violence and the differences between legitimate state action and authocratic behavior.
On Suicide
An important essay dealing with a highly uncomfortable subject. While our societal context is obviously different from Hume's, On Suicide is still thought provoking and can in many ways serve as a guide on how to think about and deal with the ethical implications of suicide, as well as ethical problems more broadly.
An important essay dealing with a highly uncomfortable subject. While our societal context is obviously different from Hume's, On Suicide is still thought provoking and can in many ways serve as a guide on how to think about and deal with the ethical implications of suicide, as well as ethical problems more broadly.
Maybe the most important work of political philosophy in the 20th century. Whether or not you agree wth Rawls's views, if you are interested in political theory or ethics you cannot get around engaging with him in some way. Unfortunately it also reads like a brick. Unless you are really dedicated, I would recommend limiting yourself to a couple of key chapters and otherwise learning about Rawls through secondary literature, lectures, etc.
Maybe the most important work of political philosophy in the 20th century. Whether or not you agree wth Rawls's views, if you are interested in political theory or ethics you cannot get around engaging with him in some way. Unfortunately it also reads like a brick. Unless you are really dedicated, I would recommend limiting yourself to a couple of key chapters and otherwise learning about Rawls through secondary literature, lectures, etc.
Just not a good book. While some of the underlying ideas are cool, the book is very shallow. The characters are extremely one-dimensional (the main villain rapes or murders someone in most chapters he is involved in, often in sections that are entirely incidental to the main story and feel like they were just included to make sure you wouldn't forget who the bad guys are) and behave unnaturally. It takes one of the main characters about ten minutes to recover from his beloved wife dying from childbirth in his arms, immediatly falling in love with a woman he saw once before and who pretty much rapes him on the spot. The story also doesn't feel medieval. It feels like most characters are from the 20th century larping "dark ages" England. Finally, way to much of the book is just porn. I really did not wish to know how much the author likes large boobs, but now I do.
Just not a good book. While some of the underlying ideas are cool, the book is very shallow. The characters are extremely one-dimensional (the main villain rapes or murders someone in most chapters he is involved in, often in sections that are entirely incidental to the main story and feel like they were just included to make sure you wouldn't forget who the bad guys are) and behave unnaturally. It takes one of the main characters about ten minutes to recover from his beloved wife dying from childbirth in his arms, immediatly falling in love with a woman he saw once before and who pretty much rapes him on the spot. The story also doesn't feel medieval. It feels like most characters are from the 20th century larping "dark ages" England. Finally, way to much of the book is just porn. I really did not wish to know how much the author likes large boobs, but now I do.
Unlike the first two books, I did not really enjoy reading this one. As the storyline becomes more fantastical, the worldbuilding, previously a strongsuit of the series, begins to suffer somewhat. Additionally, the unengaging characters and sometimes questionable views of the author already present in the first two books, really begin to cut through. The ending also drags on unnecessarilly long, I basically had to force myself to finish it.
Unlike the first two books, I did not really enjoy reading this one. As the storyline becomes more fantastical, the worldbuilding, previously a strongsuit of the series, begins to suffer somewhat. Additionally, the unengaging characters and sometimes questionable views of the author already present in the first two books, really begin to cut through. The ending also drags on unnecessarilly long, I basically had to force myself to finish it.
Good read with some surprising turns. While it discusses the (in my view) most interesting concepts of the series, unfortunately the characters are not very engaging. Additionally, the book makes you question some of the authors views, particularly on women.
Good read with some surprising turns. While it discusses the (in my view) most interesting concepts of the series, unfortunately the characters are not very engaging. Additionally, the book makes you question some of the authors views, particularly on women.
Good science fiction story covering a range of interesting topics. While the characters are not the most engaging, the book gets carried by its overall strong storytelling. Easily the best knstallment of the series, unfortunately the sequels did fall of quite a bit.
Good science fiction story covering a range of interesting topics. While the characters are not the most engaging, the book gets carried by its overall strong storytelling. Easily the best knstallment of the series, unfortunately the sequels did fall of quite a bit.
Great allegory of the Russian revolution. Sharply develops many important themes and criticisms, while staying highly readable with many extremely quotable section that will stay stuck in your mind indefinitely.
Great allegory of the Russian revolution. Sharply develops many important themes and criticisms, while staying highly readable with many extremely quotable section that will stay stuck in your mind indefinitely.
Highly relevant and impactful book that has lost none of its relevance. Unfortunately, I did not much enjoy the read itself. Winston is just not a very engaging character, making it difficult to stay interested in an otherwise well conceptualised world. I feel like Orwell's quality as an other shines through a lot more in some of his other works, such as animal farms and many of his essays.
Highly relevant and impactful book that has lost none of its relevance. Unfortunately, I did not much enjoy the read itself. Winston is just not a very engaging character, making it difficult to stay interested in an otherwise well conceptualised world. I feel like Orwell's quality as an other shines through a lot more in some of his other works, such as animal farms and many of his essays.
Famously difficult read, but great book for anyone that loves the worldbuilding of the Lord of the Rings and wants more of it. While some sections really drag on, others contain exceptional stories in and of themselves. Overall, the Silmarillion really shows the depth and love for detail Tolkien invested into his work.
Famously difficult read, but great book for anyone that loves the worldbuilding of the Lord of the Rings and wants more of it. While some sections really drag on, others contain exceptional stories in and of themselves. Overall, the Silmarillion really shows the depth and love for detail Tolkien invested into his work.