This is a face paced, thought provoking read. However it wasn't exactly what I was expecting. I picked it up after listening to an interview with the author, and the description of the opening chapters really grabbed me. With the perspectives jumping back and forth from Emira, and her employer Alix, I was hoping for a story about race, growing up, female friendship and motherhood. However, with the introduction of Emira's boyfriend as the antagonist, it really started to lose me. Alix goes from being a kind of quirky, somewhat self obsessed mom, to suddenly being the full on villain of the story. I would have bought that more if the story had been told solely from Emira's POV, but since you're in so much of Alix's head from the beginning it felt like a weird twist.
I was also surprised to learn that the author lives in Philadelphia, because I felt like she was kind of negative towards the city. Alix treats moving from NYC to Philadelphia as if she's moving to a farm in Kansas, and I never really understood why. The train ride between the cities is like an hour and a half. Philadelphia is a big, vibrant, historic city with a lot of cool neighborhoods, with the bonus of being much more affordable than Manhattan. Given a choice, I choose to visit and live in Philly. I was so confused about why Alix was hiding the fact that she moved to basically an equivalent, if not better, city.
There were also some weird elements that I thought were confusing choices on the authors part. She uses Emira's sibling's success to illustrate Emira's own dissatisfaction with not being able to find her own passion in life, but the example she uses is that her brother wins a barista competition and lands a job at a fancy coffee shop in Texas? This was so unusual and specific that I was wondering if this actually happened to someone the author knows? And the locker / letter reveal at the end was a real stretch, it would have been better to leave it ambiguous for the readers. I can't think of any reason why Alex would have been cleaning out everyone's lockers at the end of the school year - the author's reasoning that it was traditionally the job of the student council just felt like nonsense.
Overall it's not a bad read, I can see why it's getting a lot of buzz this year. The ending was underwhelming, the jump forward in time added little to the story.
This is a rare instance where I like the movie better that the book. Mainly because Tom Cruise as Lestat is amazing, but also, the costumes, the hair, the Louis being the archetypal brooding vampire while Lestat joyfully eats half of New Orleans....
I rewatched the movie the same day I finished the audiobook, and the two are very similar. They change Louis' back story a bit, in the movie his catalyst is his wife dying in childbirth, which the book has a disturbing story about his fifteen year old brother suffering religious delusions and then falling down the stairs, I understand why they went with the more succinct backstory for the movie. Also Babette is cut, and Louis' relationship with Armand ends a bit differently. The most surprising thing is that in the book Lestat goes to Paris, and tells they vampires there that Claudia and Louis tried to kill him, which explains why they try to kill Louis and Claudia. It was kind of strange that they cut that from the movie.
This is some pretty great escapist fun, along the lines of a soap opera in book form. If you're looking for a light read this is a good choice, however, I was really bummed that the ending is just one big cliffhanger. You get to the end and realize it's just all just been one long setup for the next book, none of the storylines or romantic entanglements have resolution. If I'd known that I probably would have waited until I could read both books together.