I have never read anything remotely like this book

Alternates between clever and silly. Lacks the awe and wonder I'm drawn to in sci-fi, and the world building stalls out pretty early on. But it mostly kept my attention.

This was unpleasant

Good book about a terrible thing. Glad I'm not alone

This is silly. And why is there a concrete slab on the second floor of a residential building?!?!

I'm not entirely sure what I just read. But large parts of it revolved around solving equations and scientists bickering with each other about the merits of research vs applied sciences. And that's everything I could ever hope for in a book.

Well written, but very slow. I also personally found the constantly switching character perspectives distracting and gimmicky

Evolution as plot device

The first book used science and exploration to solve a horror mystery. This one uses HR management to get some paperwork straightened out.

I'm a sucker for a story where the characters don't have names and are only identified by their scientific field of expertise

I usually love a story about a skeptical, stoic medical professional woman who sets out to disprove paranormal phenomenon, but this was boring as all get-out

Jon Ronson doing what he does best–interacting with crazy people and then writing charming, quirky essays about the encounter

The continuing adventures of Jon Ronson and Alex Jones, professional crazy person

I don't know why I read this. It is very silly

It's insane how good this

The afterward describes the mathematical proofs and Kurt Vonnegut quotes that inspired the stories. I think this book is my soul mate

This book (much like Scandinavia) is a bit monotonous and dull at times. But also pleasant and inoffensive. (Except for Sweden. Sweden is terrifying.)

[b:The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy 76527 The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman Laurence Sterne https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1403402384s/76527.jpg 2280279] in space. Yet somehow weirder

Less obnoxious than most books of similar persuasions, but still an exercise in spotting the logical fallacies